User talk:Fre1675

Stop trying to cover it up stuff. the links and references speak for themselves.

February 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on AVADirect. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Ged UK  19:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

How does this work?
I'm the CEO of AVADirect. My name is Alex Sonis. Fact! That states in article! Why is editor letting some guy to edit our article with out any prove of the facts? The same guy created many pages on the internet about us with complete lies and editor is using them, as a fact? The fact is that we have other websites registered under Freedom USA Inc. and that is a fact, even if it's not related to AVADirect. That is fine. Let it be there. We have nothing to hide, but I do not think that lies should be in the article.

Example: Dell has many angry customers, should they go to DELL Article and add all links to the page?

We are NOT trying to cover anything us, all we are doing is bringing the fact (and only) to AVADirect page with out abuse of it. Can you please advise?


 * Hello. I removed the controversy section from AVADirect because all of the sources for that section were from an online forum, which is not a reliable, third party source per wikipedia standards. Be aware though, that the section may be recreated, and that if it is properly sourced there will be no problems with it. Wikipedia has policies about neutral point of view as well as balancing articles. As the article includes sections on awards and positive responses to your company, it is only fair to include criticisms as well. Beach drifter (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:BFAQ. For legal, see Contact us. 92.41.110.58 (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Beach Drifter, IP 68.162.177.61 is from the state of PA. This is very ill guy (has to be). Do you want me to undo his post again? I do not want your system to ban my account. I'm trying follow all the rules, but this guy it still doing it. Could you please place "page protection" on our article ? Thank you, Alex.
 * Hi Alex, the matter here is not of who should edit the article. The concerned matter is of reliable sources. You can write all the relevant content on article as long as it is properly cited. Also care should be taken when removing any material from article. You can freely remove any disputed content that is not properly cited from a notable source. But you'll have to remember that the quality of content is judged by the quality of citation. I hope that this clears up your concerns. Feel free to chat with us live here, or drop a message on my talk page, or put another helpme tag. —  Hamza  [ talk ]  05:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)