User talk:FreakyLocz14

 Your ability to edit this talk page during the block has been revoked due to abuse of the unblock template. If you wish to appeal the block further, contact the unblock mailing list at . Daniel Case (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Your recent edit to the page New Boyz appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take ua look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Man way  00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


 * You're making virtually identical edits to those that were being made by a related IP address - it's a little hard to claim that it was not you when they're identical, isn't it? A quick glance through your edits show you're trying to make Wikipedia into the National Enquirer - minute pieces of trivial information that don't really hold up as encyclopedic for the most part - then reinserting them against WP:CONSENSUS at times. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't find the edits that led to the block, so I can't assess whether the block is justified. Can you it clarify please? JamesBWatson (talk) 15:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

User:JamesBWatson: I can see some cases where edits that were undone were reinserted by me, but that was in good-faith. The edits I mad at Harry Reid, for example, were of actual happenings. The edits I made about accusations of vote fraud were clearly mentioned as mere accusations that were never investigated, and the edits I made about his comments about Kirsten Gillibrand seemed relevant to me under the Criticism area because it was an issue that was brought up during the 2010 campaign. The edits I reinserted at New Boyz were due to confusion over whether Tevin Carr was considered a member of the group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FreakyLocz14 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 7 July 2011
 * 1) Edit warring is not permitted, even if you think you were right. (In fact, it would be totally pointless to have an edit warring policy which, instead of of saying "don't edit war" said "don't edit war unless you believe you are right", as invariably both sides think they are right.)
 * 2) The fact that you argue that you were justified in edit warring actually reduces the likelihood that you will be unblocked, as it suggests a failure to understand the relevant guideline, and a likelihood that you will do the same again.
 * 3) Your denial of having made unlogged-in edits is unconvincing, and phrasing it as "I don't recall making edits logged out" rather than "I didn't make edits logged out" does not substantially change anything. It is clear from your comments that you have checked back at the relevant editing history in order to defend yourself, and it is improbable that you are still unaware that you edited without logging in, even if we assume that it was an oversight at the time.
 * 4) I have now seen that some of your edits bear a close relationship to some made before from another IP address which is blocked. This therefore raises the possibility that your block evasion may have been on a bigger scale than I thought, and also that you may have edit warred on a bigger scale than I realised.
 * 5) I have now examined your edits in more detail. (Previously my main concern was determining whether there was evidence to support the reason given for the block, and I took little notice of other aspects.) It is clear that you have been involved in serious violations of the Biography of Living Persons policy, making serious accusations of criminal offences without providing any reliable source. I do hope that by the time you finish at law school you will know better.
 * 6) In the light of the above you will not be surprised to learn that I no longer think there is a case for unblocking you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 01:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)