User talk:Fred J/Archive Feb

GA/R
How long do the Good Article Reviews go on for and if a majority of the editors say it passes does it pass? And is there a way to archive the review earlier because I want to nominate it for FAC soon. Thanks. Kyriakos 23:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Have patience! A few more days maybe. / Fred-Chess 11:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Höör_City_Arms.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Höör_City_Arms.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

About Scania, again :)
Fred, I started to work on a brief summary of castle architecture for the culture section of the Scania article today, but I realized that there is no Scanian Castles article or List of Scanian Castles to refer to. I have started to compile one here in my sandbox. I'll try to finish it up before the weekend, but if you have the time, it'd be great if I could get some help to move the gallery pics to their respective articles so that we can start stubs for some of the castles and so that we are left with a smaller gallery section. If you have a chance, that is. Best, Pia 23:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, Fred, I'm pretty much finished with the new additions for the Scania article. I decided to skip the city architecture-it's just getting too long. Copy editing and tightening, reorg., etc etc left to do though. Unfortunately, I'm out of Wiki time now, and will be gone for the rest of the week. I would have liked to add a couple of nice pictures, especially of a typical church, preferably one that is mentioned, and perhaps one of Malmö city library for the literature section (well, except, I think I forgot to insert the sentence about Skånesamlingen, the Scanian Collection, the 250 shelf meters of books of Scanian literature there, which is supposedly the largest in the world.) Please, if you think we need it, could you select some pictures for the article? I saw tons of nice church pics at wikimedia commons before. I think they were sorted under Pictures of Scanian Churches there. Got to go. Best, Pia 14:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Skånesamligen is nice, I've been there many times. I'll check Commons; I created the gallery you mentioned so I should know. / Fred-Chess 17:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Fred, a friend e-mailed me last night to say that I'm the one who removed the nice and descriptive church pic that was in the article when I started editing. Blush, blush. Sorry, I didn't realize--that was an unintentional delete. (It must have happened in one of my first edits because I kept wondering why there was no pic of a church at all in there. I actually went looking for one and grabbed one that wasn't descriptive.) Uhrrmmm, he also said that the Turning Torso was missing and wondered if I had edited out that image as well. Just letting you know: I'm going back through the edits right now to see if I can find where I messed up with those two image tags, so there's no need to look through commons again for a new church pic and a new modern architecture pic for the article. Pia 11:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm, yes, you removed my image. I remember the Summer I took the bus out to Sjöbo, and walked for 45 minutes in the heat to finally get to the church.
 * Anyways, I've asked Väsk to complete Gallery of Scanian churches and he filled out the Lund section. Do you think we should add every Scanian church, or just the notable ones that have good images?
 * Fred-Chess 16:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's a very nice picture, well worth the trouble you went through to get it. I'm amazed and thrilled over the amount of high quality images you and other photographers among the Swedish Wikipedians have managed to assemble. Great job! About the church gallery: I think the notable ones with good pics only, but I won't be able to help out, I'm afraid. I'm here on borrowed time now...I have kept sneaking out of bed in the middle of the night to update and check on articles lately, and then I have to suffer the consequences the next day, all sleepy and unfocused. I really have limit my Wikipedia activities to weekends or I'll be in serious trouble now. Pia 20:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks Fred. Got your message. Seems like reasonable points. I'll see what I can do myself, but maybe I need to ask for some input about the negative stuff. I didn't know about the lead recommendations. Nice! (But I'm afraid to even try the wikiholic meter..right now I'm supposed to be in my car, out of here, and people are waiting. Can't possibly tell them I'm late because I've been updating the Scanian ling. article in Wikipedia! Crazy!) :) Best, Pia 06:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Semen2 image
I see that the image is back on the commons site, but not appearing on the Wikipedia semen article? Perhaps the image name on Wikipedia is salt'ed? It does not seem to be on the MediaWiki:Bad image list. Atom 16:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes I noticed this problem. I think it is just due to database lag :-)
 * Fred-Chess 16:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Swedish history
If you find any edits controversial, feel free to add this kind of tag:, as that will help me and others identify the spots where you need to go to the library to check out facts. Best,--Berig 15:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok. / Fred-Chess 16:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Skara symbol.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Skara symbol.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Nobel Prize
wow dude...don't you think it might have been a good idea to first put the matter up for discussion before dumping this much data? --emerson7 | Talk 22:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmmm, no, it seemed clear to me! :-)
 * Fred-Chess 22:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fred, sorry I'm horribly busy at the moment and can't be relied upon. I'm only able to spend short mini-sessions online..just enough to check in here for small, fun, easy tasks at the moment. When pressure in real life eases a bit, I'll make sure to check it out. Best wishes, Pia 02:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Wallenberg
Don't forget to vote here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Raoul Wallenberg. I already deleted the links you suggested. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 01:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC).

Sorry
Sorry for reverting your edits. I honestly don't know what happened. I saw them this tool that shows recent changes. It looked like lots of content had been removed, but I guess I didn't read the edit summary. Once again, sorry... I'll try to make sure it doesn't happen again. Danski14 02:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Umeå City Arms.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Umeå City Arms.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Pagra shtak  00:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Umeå City Arms.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Umeå City Arms.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Pagra shtak  00:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)