User talk:Fred wander

August 2017
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Inedia. While well-sourced, objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

-> It wasn't intended to be promotion, that info makes people aware of the currently only known way to approach this technique safely, because it is a completely supervised process...
 * No, starving one self is an unsafe process regardless of how it's carried out. You would need professionally published mainstream academic medical sources to add the material, and I don't see any reliable results out there about "the end of eating discovered!"  Ian.thomson (talk) 21:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lactose intolerance shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)