User talk:Freda120

Welcome!
Hello, Freda120, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Barbara Neski, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Exemplo347 (talk) 00:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Barbara Neski


A tag has been placed on Barbara Neski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/event/weekend-utopian/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Freda120/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Freda120/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/event/weekend-utopian/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Pasting from the sandbox talk page, in case that gets deleted: Sorry; that's the result of haste. Since we were about to be evicted I said yes without actually reading it. No, pasting paragraphs or even sentences into an article is not permitted because it's a copyviol (Wikijargon abbreviation). Besides, the prose is breathlessly promotional. So, you will have to write it again in your sandbox, using your own words but following WP:Neutral. We don't say someone is excellent or dreadful or anything like that, when we speak with the voice of Wikipedia. When we quote, it's in quotation marks and it isn't whole paragraphs and the whole article is not made of quotations. We mostly speak with new words saying old things but in total neutrality.


 * Now adding a bit more; don't try to contest the article's speedy deletion; you can't save it as long as the words are at all like they are now. I think speedy deletion of the sandbox has been prevented by our comments and by my deleting all text. You should look at some short artist biographies and imitate the most neutralistic ones you can find. It shouldn't take you very long before you're ready to ask me whether it's in condition to be published again. Jim.henderson (talk) 01:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Neski
Please feel free to re-create the article, this time in your own words without the copied text. You might want to work up a version in Word or a text editor and then copy the paraphrased version into Wikipedia if you need to start from the source, though that can lead to trouble too. As a fellow architect I encourage you to write about architects, architecture and design and will be happy to help out. You just can't copy other written material into Wikipedia.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)