User talk:Fredd7271


 * Reviewing admins: Personally I think it's a good block, however in the name of fairness I've agreed to post this request on their behalf and further I have no issue if you wish to edit the block. Of course be sure to consider the previous issues raised on their talk page prior to blanking, and of course socks used. I have also alerted the user that the autoblock on the IP used will not effect other users of their apartment building after 24 hours of no abuse. Nja 247 15:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note that I confused this user with another (both their user names start with Fr). Therefore there was no reason for me to post this on their behalf as they can edit their own talk page! Regardless, it's done and here for you to make your decision. Cheers, Nja 247 15:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Note: I don't dispute that it's a good block. I'm just asking to be forgiven for this one isolated incident given my otherwise clean record and in light of the substantial contributions I've made to certain articles. Obviously, if a similar incident occurs in the future, I would deserve to be permanently banned. fredd7271 247 15:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Warned you before about this
I warned you before not to remove declined unblock requests while you are currently blocked. This is unacceptable. I have returned these declined requests above. Do not remove these again, or you will not be allowed to edit your talk page anymore. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 17:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Jpgordon
I created the username to make the one disputed edit. Since it was a new username, I was unable to. Like I said, this whole controversy is over one poorly thought-out attempt to make a joke by changing the team's uniforms from red to pink. All that was necessary was a simple revert and the entire issue would've been over. Since then the disproportionate response of both myself and other users have turned this into an unnecessary fiasco.

Ivy League template
Definitely not trying to make this worse, but you created a duplicate template - I notified WikiProject College football and it will probably be deleted, but not by me. These things (duplicates) happen, no biggie. I admit I have a slight personal interest as an old (too old) Ivy League. Dougweller (talk) 19:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Didn't see that. Someone should add the template to the individual team pages. fredd7271


 * It looks as though it is, a quick check on What links here: . Dougweller (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I see what you're talking about. Some schools have articles on individual teams though (i.e. Penn Quakers basketball) which do not have the template. fredd7271

Changing others comments
Please do not change the text of the comments that other people leave you, as you have done here:. You may respond to other people's comments, but changing the words of others to say something different is misleading and disruptive. Do not do it anymore. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 03:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Look, I'll be one of the first to note that most of your edits have been productive, particularly to your apparent favorite NFL team. You just happened to do something petty and vindictive to an article I have on my watchlist. I'm sorry (well actually, not so much) that the Jags can't beat the Texans. That being said, if you'll promise to stay away from rival teams' articles, adhere to the principles of this encyclopedia, to renounce the use of sock- and/or meatpuppets, and to heed the advice left on this page for you, I'll unblock you myself. Deal? — Travis talk  03:44, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Abuse of admin power? Look, you were given a short block for vandalism and personal attacks. When you then escalated to sockpuppetry and throwing about unfounded accusations, i.e. more personal attacks, you were blocked indefinitely by another admin. In spite of all that, I offered to unblock you if you would promise to renounce your disruptive behavior. In case you're interested, that offer is still open. — Travis talk  02:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JaguarsAlternateLogo1.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:JaguarsAlternateLogo1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JaguarsOldLogo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:JaguarsOldLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JaguarsInauguralSeasonlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:JaguarsInauguralSeasonlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:JagsFound.gif
Thank you for uploading File:JagsFound.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 10:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)