User talk:FrederickJPorter

Orphaned non-free image File:Metalabwhiteboard.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Metalabwhiteboard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Skier Dude. I did have the image in the article Annabeth Robinson. But since uploading it I have decided that I am unable to completely 100% declare it's free use. I've tried to find some sort of license for it but can only assume that since it is a screen shot of work created on the Multi User Virtual Environment Second Life, that it must belong to them. I'm more than happy to delete it myself if needs be. But will also be happy to allow it to be deleted by someone else. I'm really sorry for any confusion caused, I am a newbie to Wikipedia. Thanks for the post. FrederickJPorter (talk) 06:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Notability
Please don't question the motivations of experienced volunteer editors who try to enforce the notability standards here on Wikipedia. Those are the very standards that have allowed the success of a collaborative volunteer project that has created 3.8 million free encyclopedia articles in English, and millions more in other languages. This is the 5th most popular website in the world, and we've achieved that visibility because we have standards. Our rules aren't that hard to learn to play by. Study and follow our policies and guidelines, and you too, can be a productive contributor to the world's greatest encyclopedia.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  04:40, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hiya! I'm sorry, I'm not sure that I understand what instance you might be talking about. I'm really sorry if I've offended in anyway. Could you please explain what you mean. Thanks, FrederickJPorter (talk) 04:55, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Your comment didn't offend me, but I thought it deserved a response. I was referring to your remark on the Annabeth Robinson talk page: "Hey Friend! That looks good, we will have to chop it down a bit as it's a bit long. I'm having a bit of luck finding stuff on google scholar. Just reading about her whiteboard and her new 'handsUp' chair that she created. Really done a lot. It's a wonder how her notability was questioned."  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  05:13, 3 November 2011 (UTC)