User talk:Fredericknapoleon005

April 2019
Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Drake (musician), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me!   09:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Drake (musician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me!   18:37, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dr. Dre, you may be blocked from editing.  Rob van  vee  19:16, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jay-Z, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  10:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Jay-Z
"He is regarded as one of the world's most significant cultural icons and has been a global figure in popular culture for over two decades.", "The Blueprint (2001) and The Black Album (2003) later being heralded as modern musical classics." and "Jay-Z is among the most critically acclaimed musicians of all time" are not facts and do no reflect on the sources you've put. Isaacsorry (talk) 16:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Jay-Z. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Rob van  vee  17:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Stop redacting sourced content from Eminem. Discuss your proposed removal on the Talk page and gain consensus for the changes.  General Ization Talk  02:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Eminem shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  General Ization Talk  02:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  02:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)