User talk:FrederikSchack

Hi Kaasje,

Thanks, I will do my best to follow the wikipedia code of conduct and will appreciate any guiding hand while learning to be a good wikipedian :o)

FrederikSchack 19:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.  B e  arly  541  02:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  B e  arly  541  03:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Equibit


The article Equibit has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)