User talk:Fredlamont

1

Image copyright problem with Image:Nicelogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nicelogo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:30, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fred NICE
A tag has been placed on Fred NICE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 14:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Fred, I did delete the article on the grounds above. There was no indigaction to as why this subjet is significant, to warrant inclusion. You may want to take a look at WP:N and WP:V, to see how the notability guidelines work. It basicly comes down to the following: any article should demonstrate why it is important, and show that they do by showing that reliable sources, independent of the subject, have given the subject more than trivial coverage. All claims made in the article should be verifiable by reliable sources. You can find what Wikipedia calls a reliable sources at WP:RS. I hope this clears things up for you. If it doesn't, by all means ask! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)