User talk:Fredperry2016

Welcome!
Hello, Fredperry2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Regressive Left
Hello Fredperry2016, the current introductory section in the article Regressive left was arrived at after long discussions on the article's talk page. While it's true that the bloggers you cite have mentioned the phrase "regressive left", it has, in my humble opinion, very little to do with how the term/phrase is interpreted currently by many commentators who are mentioned throughout the article. So this little tidbit about some blogger coincidentally coining the same phrase in some random blog entry seems really out of place within the context of the article as it stands now, and frankly, it is not really notable since this particular instance and its definition has never been picked up by any commentator at all. That's why I have removed it for now. If you still think that it should be mentioned, please consider starting a discussion on this in the talk page of the article. Again, I have nothing against you contributing, but I feel you need to discuss it with other editors on the talk page before we decide what to do with this information, whether to include it or not, and if yes, where. Zaheen (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

I see that you have already opened up a discussion on it. Great. See you there. Zaheen (talk) 19:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I can see that you are being bold and are very much interested into keeping this information in the article, but I think its notability is debatable and it's better to talk it out with other contributors on the talk page of the article who have been working on it for a while now. I assume you will engage in good faith and assume other are acting on good faith as well without resorting to namecalling or labeling. The lead section has come into being after long discussions between Wikipedians of different points of view. I will revert your edit one last time, but please note that is not an attempt to outright reject your contribution in any manner and I might turn out to be wrong. So please don't revert back and have a conversation first in the article's talk page and wait until it is decided what to do with the info. Thanks. Zaheen (talk) 14:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)