User talk:Fredweis

Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 75.41.71.106 14:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits.

You claimed in your edit summary that Borrelia_burgdorferi was replaced with Lyme_disease_microbiology (which in fact was written separately), but you merged only selective content into the Lyme_disease_microbiology page.

Curiously, you merged your own contributions but not other content. Eg. the life cycle concept and reference from MacDonald was deleted and not moved to the other page, which seems rather sneaky. Hopefully this was not your intent.

I will add the rest of the content to Lyme_disease_microbiology myself. In the future, please do not delete content from any Wikipedia article without a valid explanation. 75.41.71.106 14:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Help with dermatology-related content
I am looking for more help at the dermatology task force, particularly with our Bolognia push!? Perhaps you would you be able to help us? I could send you the login information for the Bolognia push if you are interested? ---kilbad (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems: Eli Lilly controversies
This article may be a problem under our copyright policies, since the text seems very closely paraphrased from a number of sources. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

These are just examples; there are more examples of copying in some of these as well as other sources.

As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch.

The article has been replaced with a notice of these copyright concerns that includes directions for resolving them. If the material can be verified to be compatibly licensed or public domain or if permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution. If you can resolve it that way, please let me know if you need assistance with those directions. Otherwise, so that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten; there is a link to a temporary space for that purpose in the instructions which now appear in place of the article. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Please let me know if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)