User talk:Free.jordan38

Welcome!

Hello, Free.jordan38, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 04:08, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Queen Rania of Jordan, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk  03:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Queen Rania of Jordan. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk  03:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Queen Rania of Jordan, you may be blocked from editing.  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 04:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Regarding this addition to Queen Rania of Jordan, I believe you made the addition in good faith. However, there were three problems with the addition:
 * It was too detailed to go in the introduction to the article. Instead, I moved it to the #Corruption allegations section of the article.
 * The leaked cables on Wikileaks are a primary source and should not be cited in an article on principle. The cables had no reason to be cited here, since they did not support the added text.
 * Your prose appeared to misrepresent what the reporter's story covered. It was not directly about the alleged corrupt activities of Rania; it was about tribes in Jordan speaking out about their concerns. Accordingly, I condensed your text, brought it in line with what the story covered, and combined it into the first (now only) paragraph of the Corruption allegations section.
 * Remember that neutral point of view is a key value of Wikipedia. Editors should be careful to avoid introducing bias from either side of a subject. This is critical when an editor has a username that suggests a bias or conflict of interest with a subject. —C.Fred (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Queen Rania of Jordan. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you wish to discuss why the changes have been removed, I'm glad to discuss the matter with you. If you continue inserting the text without discussion and gaining consensus, then your acts will be deemed to be disruptive, and your editing privileges will be revoked. —C.Fred (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, as you have mentioned "freedom of speech" in at least two edit summaries, you might want to look at WP:Free speech. Pay particular note that "As a private website, Wikipedia has the legal right to block, ban, or otherwise restrict any individual from editing its pages, or accessing its content, with or even without reason." —C.Fred (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. 06:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)