User talk:Free Press USA

.

I did not use false info or no sources.


 * I have asked you before to not remove declined unblock requests while the block remains in effect. See WP:OWNTALK for the relevant policy. If you keep on doing that, you may lose talk page access. Also, reliability of sources is a concern. A website "Paid for by John Cox for Governor 2018" hardly is a reliable source on Cox' competitors. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for political propaganda. Huon (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

First of all it is because it gives facts from other SOURCES to like Planned Parenthoods own web page about Travis Allen. You have not shown the sources to be un reliable, the things on it are the FACTS. Your the one breaking Wikipedias rules and your Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia)If you do not show the facts. I want to be un blocked now because you and the other people have not shown substanisal evidence why I need to be blocked. The only way I see you keeping me blocked is that your a Travis Allen supporter. Thanks

I looked at your thing I'm not breaking any rules by deleting things on wikipedia i quote "Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages."


 * Comment to patrolling admins: Other unblock requests have apparently been removed (see page history) by blocked user. - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page  (chat page, contribs) 21:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You are not just posting facts, you are posting them in a manner consistent with your political persuasion in a manner clearly designed to be critical of the people whose articles you are editing. I have also restored the declined unblock requests, they must remain until the block is lifted. If you remove them again, I will remove your talk page access. 331dot (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Final warning, do not remove prior requests again. 331dot (talk) 21:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Neil N  talk to me 22:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your selective quoting of the guideline is as productive as your editing. "There are certain types of notices that users may not remove from their own talk pages, such as declined unblock requests and speedy deletion tags." --Neil N  talk to me 22:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)