User talk:Freedom191

Re: Uniform CPA Exam article.

Please discuss your disagreement about the fingerprint section of the article with Mitch93 and resolve the issue. It is tiring as an editor and user to see the section pop in and out of the article so frequently. I will make this suggestion to Mitch93 as well. If you cannot resolve your disagreement, I suggest the issue be submitted to mediation or other dispute resolution process.

While my personal preference is either to delete it or simply to mention that fingerprinting of candidates began in January 2008 and has been controversial [with pertinent citations to support that fact], I would leave the final judgment to a consensus of additional views. However, if it is to be included in a substantially unchanged form, it does need to be edited for style. It has a clear POV and the end of the paragraph is written as phrases, not sentences, making it very choppy to read.

Drbb01 (talk) 14:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Uniform Certified Public Accountant Examination
Hi there

I've reverted you last edit to the Uniform Certified Public Accountant Examination article, because I don't think the heading you have been using is consistent with HEAD. In particular it is:

- overly long

- is a complete sentence rather than a noun phrase

- contains words or acronyms that are not needed as they are implied by the article or covered in the following text (ie there is no need to refer to AICPA, CPA Examinee, fingerprints, foreign data-mining firm etc).

If you want to redo the heading, please discuss it on the article talk page, noting why you think it is consistent with WP naming conventions.

By the way, I do think the section is notable, well sourced and should stay. I think, however, that the tone and the content need to be worked on to ensure consistency with WP policies. It's important to ensure that you get as much consensus to this content from other editors as possible to avoid edit wars. Seth ze (talk) 08:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)