User talk:Freedom of Expression in a Pluralistic World Order

Best Admin, As you had said few times, an article will be deleted within a week (7 days) after the overall discussion and voting. In this case I have waited till now and the majority of the votes have agreed to the deletion of my article. Since as indicated previously, it is not my intention to damage someone's reputation I am requesting you to delete this article now that also a week has passed for which you had let the article stay for a week with all the damaging wikipedia messages above the article. Now that the seven days have passed and the majority have voted to delete my article and as I my self have time and over again asked you to delete it, I hereby request you to delete it after this deletion discussion and the elapse of one full week. KR

No problem, then please remove my article as I have repeatedly requested which you have also considered as promotion. So if it is promotion or in any sense in violation of your rules that u maintain then why dont you just delete it?! then if it is in violation then delete it to which I both consent and am asking repeatedly! so why do you contradict yourself: you dont want it but you keep it?! why this irrational contradiction? if you dont want it then delete it as it is 'my' writing and I am asking for it too and agree with you that it should be deleted. you can very well read and summerize my points and words then why do you read over my request of removal if you so much want to remove it as you have anounced its removal in public too? so if you want to remove then dont read over my words either that I also ask you to remove it. so remove it please! As the following admin had said and to which I agree, remove it please: 23:16, 11 April 2015‎ Barek (talk | contribs)‎. . (5,679 bytes) (+2,169)‎. . (Speedy deletion nomination of Ambrogino G. Awesta) (undo) remove also the 'Contested deletion' message which is also public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedom of Expression in a Pluralistic World Order (talk • contribs) 22:28, 12 April 2015‎
 * The article is going through the AfD process. At least one editor in the AfD dsicussion seems to believe they can rework the article. At the end of the AfD discussion (usually at least seven days from when the discussion started), community consensus will be evaluated and if it supports deletion, it will be deleted at that time. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * As the block message you removed said, you're blocked for two reasons: Firstly, your username is a violation of Wikipedia's username policy because it's considered promotional; you have addressed that by choosing a new username (though we already have a User:Andrei, and even with the accent your username may be considered too similar). Secondly, your edits confirm that you're here primarily to promote Awesta. See WP:SPAM on why using Wikipedia as free ad space is not acceptable. On an unrelated note, please do not remove previous unblock requests while you are blocked. Huon (talk) 22:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)