User talk:Freewayguy

You have been blocked indefinitely
We've warned you over and over again at Editor review/Freewayguy 3, here, and just above. I see no reason why we have to put up with your careless edits. Of course, you are welcome to appeal this block, but I ask any administrator reviewing the block to contact me first before unblocking. Freewayguy was blocked for repeated incivility, repeated poor quality of edits, and in general causing more harm to the encyclopedia than he was doing good for it. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm sorry and I'm willing to improve
Thank you Lomn for unprotecting my talkpage. I will try my best now, to be careful with my edits. I will take my time, and make few edits a day, if I can, and I will not be like 3 month ago making crappy edits like making up state DOT. I can calculate. The ones I make edits 50 a day, each ones takes 3 minutes for somebody to fix them. I do the math, this takes 150 minutes for somebody to clean up. For 150 minutes, I now understand people would rather do something fun-like visiting Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco rather than sitting down cleaning up after my crummy edits. i'm sorry for my crummy work over Blue giant and blue supergiant by adding 7 sources to show improvements to articles, to fill in the work when I don't even understand what is the source about. I'm sorry Rschen for making numerous of personal attacks across wikis-just socks of harass me by their socks. I will also be careful with junction lists, use sandbox to practice if I'm naive. I undersntad when I mess up a junction lists, takes at least 5 to 10 minutes for editors to repair by hand times 5 articles i do to los Angeles-Orange County will take 30 to 60 minutes. i knowthat's a waste of time for people. I will also try to speak at a proper English, so peopel will understand. Before saving, I will preview it 3 times, to check ludicrous spelling msitakes, and try to avoid them. I will not make up terms like "Greenloop", "pink tag", the words nobody uses. Normal peopel will call it "Business loop' and "deletion tag"


 * From now on, i will only make few edits, and questions about Los Angeles-Orange County Freeways I will ask it at most on WP:RD only, nowhere else, not even on people's talkpage, and only questions having trouble finding data, not to open a forum arguement. I hope you appreciate me when I try to improve my English, and you hope it sound alot better. I won't sudden drastically chage my signatures pointlessly, displaying a blackflag, scaring people when they can ID is me without even looking at my sigs.
 * He stays blocked - . --Rschen7754 (T C) 08:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Basically, Freewayguy, you have lost our trust. Per WP:TOV we have taken your death threats seriously, as we have no way of knowing whether you are serious or not. By making the death threats, you have damaged your reputation - because of the death threats alone, there is a possibility that you may not be able to come back. Please read this story: - you came extremely close to us calling your police department and your school and also to having your internet access cut off.

What to do now? Now that you have made these threats, it may be a few years before you can return - if at all. --Rschen7754 (T C) 08:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Las Tunas Drive


The article Las Tunas Drive has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Culver Boulevard listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Culver Boulevard. Since you had some involvement with the Culver Boulevard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Artesia Boulevard


The article Artesia Boulevard has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "article has been unsourced for a very long time and does not explain how this road is notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)