User talk:Fremte/Archive 1

Newsletter tip
Hello there. I paraphrased your tip article and added it to the August Newsletter. I hope it is OK. please edit this to the wording you like, and send me a note to my talk page, if it is OK, The August newsletter will be out for delivery shortly. There had been folks talking about assembling geographical areas together perhaps like work groups or committees. There are already a few who get together to work on Regina, and Southern Sk, and a few who have consistently edited Saskatoon and area articles. Maybe something will come together to help organize Saskatchewan Wiki Project. I hope you get response for assistance in editing articles. SriMesh | talk  05:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods
I hereby invite you to WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods. I see you have shown interest in northern Saskatchewan. That interest is what we would like to see over at the project. So don't hesitate to join. We welcome you to the project if you decide to join. If you are not wanting to join right, than please pop on by and sign the guestbook. Thanks! Mr. C.C. 06:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Even if you don't want to join at this time, still pop by and sign to guestbook. Mr. C.C. 08:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

WP: SKCN Navigation Box
I am a bit confused as to why you posted the WP: SKCN navigation box on my talk page. Mr. C.C. 17:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I see all has been rectified. Mr. C.C. 17:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It's no biggie.

Welcome
I see you have taken the time to join WP: SKCN. If there is anything I can do don't hesitate to post on the project's talk page. Or anything outside the project, than post on my talk page. I look to working with you on WP: SKCN. If there is anything you would like to add to the WP: SKCN protion of the a WP: Saskatchewan newsletter, than post it on the tip line or add it directly to the WP: SKCN section and add your name to the contributors to that section. Mr. C.C. 17:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Chesterfield
Point taken---my edit summary was a little cryptic. The Jack Chambers reference was worth keeping, though. UNT, ---The user formerly known as JackLumber 18:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit to Christianity and Homosexuality
Hi. I am writing to say that I am glad that you added this: "...male-male sexual behavior since the first decades of Christianity; female-female sexual behaviour was essentially ignored ."

I am also writing to let you know that there is a discussion (albeit totally scattered) going on about this about this topic in Talk:.

And finally, I was wondering if Spong is really the best we can do.LCP 01:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

C.S. Lewis
If statements are not referenced it may be better to either delete them or request a reference. In this instance if the offending statement is not supported by a reference cite it and post a statement on the discussion page. To be bolder you could delete it and then explain your deletion on the discussion page. If someone has taken something out of context, it may be easier to delete it and explain your position. Does that sound like acceptable alternatives? --Storm Rider (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

James Dobson
Thanks for removing the "many" weasel-wording, however I'm not sure replacing the Homosexuality and psychology reference with a single outside APA link is ideal; the Wikipedia article goes into the issue in great detail and contains extensive references. NTK (talk) 04:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

intelligence or IQ
I don't understand why you have changed the link in the Religiosity and Intelligence article. The article is about Religiosity and Intellignce, and, for more information, people used to be directed to Religiosity and Intelligence. Why change the second link to Intelligence Quotient? The article uses other measures (education level) as indicators of intelligence on a population (not individual) level. Am I missing something? WotherspoonSmith (talk) 06:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)