User talk:Frequency.rate

May 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cricket World Cup. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Biddulph (talk • contribs) 11:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cricket World Cup. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mashrafe Mortaza. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  13:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

2017 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier
Do you have any sources for this article?  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 13:01, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2017 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  04:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 ICC World Twenty20.

November 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 Cricket World Cup Qualifier. What unsourced material it is the right information

Blocked
You've been here for almost 2 years, and been warned repeatedly about adding material to articles without citing where you got that information from. You have ignored every one of those warnings and kept doing it. For this reason, I have blocked this account for 1 week. If you wish to be unblocked, see the template below for instructions. -- Jayron 32 20:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jayron 32 20:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)


 * So straight off your block, you make this unsourced change. Show me with a reliable source where it states this will take place in that year? The next time you add any unsourced content, you'll be blocked again, and maybe for ever.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 10:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alex Shih (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

To be unblocked, there are two essays on guidelines that I would like you to read. They are Communication is required and Verifiability, not truth. This will help you to understand what the acceptable standards are here on English Wikipedia. Alex Shih (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)