User talk:Fresh nu start

Welcome!
Hello, Fresh nu start, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 02:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

October 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Dan56 (talk) 02:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Check the article's history subpage, and dont restore your addition; it's explained well enough in the area you edited. Dan56 (talk) 23:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Chapter V (Trey Songz album), without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 06:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 00:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Reverting in an Edit Warring
Whilst I appreciate your efforts to mediate I don't appreciate being reverted at Two Eleven or Glassheart when the discussion at Talk: Trouble (Leona Lewis song) proves that my concerns are genuine and a number of other editors agree that iTunes shouldn't be used as a reference for release histories until the issue can be resolved. So far the IP has engaged in edit warring and no other user has come forward to address the compelling concerns that I have raised that have been addressed by others. I don't understand why you've reverted my edits when it is actually the IP that has introduced information which is questionable. All I've done is restore the articles back to their last factual/uncontroversial position. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  22:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Using iTunes
Echo wasn't pushed back nor did it have a staggered release like Glassheart. I've proven on the talk page of Talk: Trouble (Leona Lewis song) and this talk page that in this instance iTunes isn't correct. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a great supporting argument for a particular edit when there are concerns about its reliability. I've gone through the effort of finding reputable retailers who sell either the physical or digital album, or both and sourced a better release history. iTunes isn't required and it is discouraged when trying to get articles to good article status or featured article status. Its funny how after reverting my edits you're now siding with the IP and also with a similar argument which doesn't address the original concerns as to why iTunes was removed in the first place. For example iTunes Taiwan claims November 5 yet Sony Music Taiwan clearly says November 27. If this was the case the album would have charted in more territories even if it was just a lower chart positions. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  23:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Because the use of iTunes is contested it should be avoided until the issue is resolved. It shouldn't just be added. Someone (me) has pointed out several factual inaccuracies that yourself (and the IP) editor have failed to resolve. Unless those are addressed adding iTunes as a reference is factually incorrect. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  23:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * There's now a formal discussion and WP:RFC at Talk:Trouble_(Leona_Lewis_song). Rather than continue editing warring you should take the time to answer the concerns posed there. Thanks &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  23:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Edits
Can you explain why this edit by the anonymous IP is almost identical to your reversion here, both of which when I removed I explicitly did so for their use of Auspop.blogspot as well as iTunes as blogs are not reliable sources but in none of your edits or feeble explanations address the removal of Auspop.blogspot?

Also if there is no issue with iTunes then why does iTunes Taiwan claim Glassheart was released November 5, as does iTunes Spain yet Sony Music (her record label) both say the album is release Nov 27? (Sony Music Taiwan Sony Music Spain) Are you really telling me iTunes was able to release the album 22 days earlier than the actual label? &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  22:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Talk, don't revert (Talk:Trouble (Leona Lewis song)). Dan56 (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Trouble (Leona Lewis song). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  23:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.