User talk:Freshstart101

 Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles


 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

, good luck, and have fun.  Horologium  (talk) 16:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 19:30, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Let's keep the discussion centralised at ANI. I do not need reminders on my talkpage. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 20:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * You know, I'm a good guy. I feel like the ex-con who just couldn't ever get a break :( Freshstart101 (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * No reason to feel like that. The only problem is if user:Hohenloh does not wish to associate with you you should respect his wish. That's all. If you can do that then there shouldn't be any problem now or in the future. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 20:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Well then, lets just see what he has to say. If that is the way he feels then fair enough. To be honest I thought I did the right thing. My behaviour was terrible so I took a long break from the site. Then I decide to come back and make it right. Whats the first thing that happens? I get reported in ANI. You couldn't make it up. Does Assume Good Faith apply equally to everyone? I guess not. Freshstart101 (talk) 20:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, AGF should normally apply, but in this case there is this demand you are making that Hohenloh must acknowledge that you should be on good terms, which is a long-standing demand from last year. This long-lasting focus on a single editor and for a specific purpose, to acknowledge good relations with you is a bit bizarre IMO. Ergo the ANI report. If you could just forget about this demand I see no problems whatever. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 21:03, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah right. If you ask me you are being a busybody and you would have better contributing to the encyclopedia rather than stirring the pot for no reason. Freshstart101 (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts and harrasment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid  ( Talk ) 21:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=So I can plead my case here? Alright then. First of all the user 'noobbody' was an account of my flatmate. I told him of the little storm in a teacup invented by some wikipedian guy and he thought it was hilarious, especially when I showed him the ANI report where Dr.K suggested a 'persistent pattern of harassment' even though I hadn't contacted user:hohenloh in almost a year. He thought this was so funny and that this guy must represent everything bad about wikipedia. Without my knowledge, he created that account to abuse and call Dr.K names, something I knew nothing about until he told me there today. Unfortunately I can see you just dismissing this without giving me a fair chance; I can physically prove my innocence if allowed appropriate latitude to avail of all existing legal methods at my disposal. As you can see, this was all a misunderstanding and I'm afraid, once again, I am not ever going to be at the received end of WP:AGF | decline={Perhaps unfortunately for you, it is less likely that we will remove your block because of that story. Truthful or not, we take you at your word and thus we will have to leave the account blocked as there is no way for us, from this end, to verify this. You'd be better off, should you truly wish to contribute and edit productively, creating a new account entirely. I'd also suggest finding flatmates who won't make your life so difficult. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2011 (UTC)}}


 * Your latest abuse of your Talk page has been reverted and your Talk page access revoked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)