User talk:Freshyill

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need further assisstance, go to my user page. I have a list of Wikipedia protocol that may be of assisstance. Martial Law 21:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC) :)


 * templates substituted by a bot as per Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

=Alternative remedies for styes=

You are certainly right that it does seems a little odd as it is, but I'm not sure that complete removal is necessarily the best path. My rationale for leaving the "Alternative Remedies" section was that this was the sort of ailment for which people regularly use folk remedies. As such, I think it may be relevant in an general, as opposed to a medical, encyclopaedia. From the point of view of completeness, utility and public health, I would suggest that, instead of deleting the section, we rename it "Folk Remedies" and rearrange it so that it commences by pointing out the clinical worthlessness and potential risks of all the folk remedies, before describing them. This gives people the full and accurate information they may be looking for. It has the secondary benefit of encouraging them to look for proper treatment. If the secondary benefit were the only justification, I would agree with removal, but I'm inclined toward editing instead.

What do you think? I'll watch this page, if you want to reply here. If you don't reply in say 24 hours I'll go ahead and edit and if you don't agree you can let me know why and we can try to work it out. Cheers!

Speedy deletion nomination of Brooklyn Industries


A tag has been placed on Brooklyn Industries requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 14:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)