User talk:FrickFrack/Archive 4

Tri-Rail station names
I recently made global capitalization edits to Tri-Rail station names in the interest of maintaining consistency with the names of U.S. rail stations in other Wikipedia articles. I note that you have reverted these edits, and that you did so without any explanation. There are three naming conventions for U.S. rail station articles. The first is where the word "station" is used as part of the name and, as with any boldfaced name, the word "station" is capitalized. For example, see the Bethpage (LIRR station) article ("Bethpage Station is a station along the Main Line . . . ."). The second convention dispenses with the word "station" as part of the name, as in this article ("Morristown is a New Jersey Transit rail station . . . ."). The third convention is similar to the second, and lumps the rail line name and the word "station" together, as in this article ("The Dobbs Ferry Metro-North Railroad station serves residents . . . . "). If capitalizing "station" in the boldfaced names of the Tri-Rail articles bothers you all that much, I would suggest using either the second or third conventions (e.g., "Hialeah Market is a Tri-Rail station" or "The Hialeah Market Tri-Rail station"). Jhw57 (talk) 14:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

A thought
I've been watching your edits on my 20K-page watchlist for some time, and I have been greatly interested in needing some help cleaning these metaphorical dumpster articles on Florida roads out and expanding them. As the only one putting in any effort in, I could really use some back up and us at the roads project need a full time Florida editor. If you want to give me a thought, I would sincerely like to know if you'd consider it. Thanks. Mitch 32(Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?) 18:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Here's a few suggestions to get you started: WP:USRD/STDS, this is our standards page on expanding an article. It might be suggestable if you join us at #wikipedia-en-roads on Internet Relay Chat. If you need a cheap IRC browser, you could a) download mIRC, b) use this or c) Use Chatzilla if you have Firefox. There are editors there, including myself, who can help you get the ropes down. It does help to some degree to join us there. Mitch 32(Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?) 18:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, there are some articles you could examples for, like Florida State Road 806 or Florida State Road 849, etc. that you could use for templates. Not that they are the best in the world, but they work. Mitch 32(Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?) 18:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Farewell (Diana Ross & the Supremes album)
Hello. According to the speedy deletion tag you left on this redirect, you'd like to move the article Diana Ross & The Supremes in its place. I'm sure that's some sort of mistake. Could you double-check and indicate what article you want moved? Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TrevorStJohn.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TrevorStJohn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Hollywood1939.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hollywood1939.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Okeechobee departure.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Okeechobee departure.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

FAR for History of Miami
This article is being reviewed for de-nomination: Daniel Christensen (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * History of Miami; talk page
 * Featured article review/History of Miami/archive1

template Greater Miami
FricFrack - I see that on July 11 2011 you changed the name of the template Miami Major commercial centers to be the template Greater Miami. I don't think this is a good idea. Could we discuss this at Template talk:Greater Miami ? --GroveGuy (talk) 02:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

The Lord Family
FrickFrack, I love your edits for the Lord family, but I have a problem--you've de-Lorded Dorian Lord! Dorian was a member of that family by marriage, yes, but she owned a big portion of the Lord estate, lived at Llanfair, and was a member of that family since her marriage to Victor. Not just in her consisten use of the name for almost forty years, but oin her relationship with Viki. In fact, from about 1975-1992, the Lords were her only family outside of Cassie. I don't think we should de-emphasize this, not just for Dorian, but for the Lord family as well. Bmf777 (talk) 01:13, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Miami street grid system
Here is a useful and informative link on the Miami street grid system. It might help clarify some things.

http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php/topic/16777-street-smart-a-fun-guide-to-miami-streets/

Essentially, Miami Avenue splits the county west and east, and Flagler Street splits the county north and south, creating four quadrants: NW, NE, SW and SE. Streets and avenues are labeled by the quadrant they're located in. For example, the Marlins Ballpark is just off NW 7th Street and NW 17th Avenue, because it is north of Flagler Street and west of Miami Avenue.--Comayagua99 (talk) 14:28, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Jezhotwells (talk) 22:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Reneedivine.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Reneedivine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Viki Joe 1969.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Viki Joe 1969.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clint and Joe.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Clint and Joe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SlezakDerwin1999.png
 Thanks for uploading File:SlezakDerwin1999.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeanrandolphviki.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Jeanrandolphviki.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:40, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Joe viki 1977.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Joe viki 1977.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination
Your nomination of Template:Did you know nominations/Joe Riley (One Life to Live) is not submitted yet. You need to complete step 3 of the instructions. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 01:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Graves Victor.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Graves Victor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Joe Riley (One Life to Live)
Hello! Your submission of Joe Riley (One Life to Live) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Good articles
I see that you've been marking articles as being WP:Good articles without nominating them or getting them reviewed. There's a specific process that you're supposed to follow for that designation. In the future, please nominate the articles that you think meet the criteria. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Liberty Square (Miami), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil Rights Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year!!!
Hi FrickFrack, have a Happy New Year!!! Best, --Discographer (talk) 23:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Graves Victor.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Graves Victor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Graves Victor.png


A tag has been placed on File:Graves Victor.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about about my edits? 05:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Victor Lord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White collar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Files of Karen Wolek under dispute
Rationales of File:Karen glamour shot.png and File:Karentrial.png are disputed. This article was discussed in WP:Media copyright questions, and some images were decided as failures to provide critical commentary. Any objections, go to that Wikipedia namespace first before you directly will be bold. George Ho (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I notice: you have removed File:Karentrial.png from the article. If you want to speedily delete that file, use db-g7. --George Ho (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Update: More images are disputed in this article. --George Ho (talk) 02:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Larry Karen 1977.png
Thank you for uploading File:Larry Karen 1977.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Clint Maria.png
Thank you for uploading File:Clint Maria.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 02:31, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tina greg.png
Thank you for uploading File:Tina greg.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tinaviki1985.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Tinaviki1985.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tina 1978.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Tina 1978.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Karentrial.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Karentrial.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Marco Dane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Exposé, Sanitarium and Joe Riley


 * One Life to Live storylines (1980–1989) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Joe Riley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

WP:YEAR
Hey - I noticed this edit - - It was correct before - please see WP:YEAR - "A closing CE or AD year is normally written with two digits (1881–86) unless it is in a different century from that of the opening year, in which case the full closing year is given (1881–1986)." Rain   the 1  19:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited One Life to Live miscellaneous characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

About another user
So it has been confirmed SEVERAL times on the show that John and Hope are MARRIED (Days of our Lives), but another user rm994 keeps reverting the edits. The show is the source, but he keeps saying it is unsourced. I noticed that when you updated it, she did the same thing. Arjoccolenty (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * First off, Rm is a he. Second of all, the show is not a source. It needs to come from a third-party source in order to be allowed truthful. Stop trying to make your own rules for Wikipedia. Music Freak 7676 TALK! 20:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No, the show is the source. That's how it is for plot summaries or plot information that has already happened on the show. Why do you think hardly any Wikipedia plot summaries (whether plays, film or television) are sourced with third-party references or any references other than the text? This was already made clear in the Storylines sections lack references discussion (which is now archived, so you can't comment there) and as recently as the Requests for comment discussion (this section is not yet archived). 67.55.104.203 (talk) 21:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * In fact, it's in the WP:SOAPS guideline as a result of that first discussion. 67.55.104.203 (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Riverwalk.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Riverwalk.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Governmentcenter.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Governmentcenter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Metrorail Extensions.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Metrorail Extensions.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:MiamiRiverApproach.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MiamiRiverApproach.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Map of Florida highlighting South Florida metro.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Map of Florida highlighting South Florida metro.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:GovtCenter.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GovtCenter.jpg, which you've sourced to "Jon Bell". I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Brickell.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Brickell.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mover-gc.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mover-gc.jpg, which you've sourced to "Paul Polischuk". I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bayfrontapproach.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bayfrontapproach.jpg, which you've sourced to "Paul Polischuk". I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Stufftowork.GIF listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stufftowork.GIF, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)