User talk:FriendlyDataNerdV2

Thank you
Thank you for removing the awful colour from the Norwich election page. That is what I was referring to when I said consensus along with the way the numbers are in the infobox. as for the sliders I cant stand them but I can see i have no support on that So I accidentally removed it. 2.25.207.51 (talk) 07:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries. You make a good point about the colours, I think you were right to remove them - thanks for doing so. All the best FriendlyDataNerdV2 (talk) 10:37, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Of interest, re. Lewisham East
On the Lewisham East by-election, 2018 page, you readded a table showing the results of the Labour Party selection process. This was later removed. A lack of consensus means that the subject is now being pursued on the talk page if you are interested. Matt 190417 (talk) 14:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, cheers for the heads up! It's appreciated. FriendlyDataNerdV2 (talk) 15:34, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Oh! Thank you :) FriendlyDataNerdV2 (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

United Kingdom general election, 1992 (Wales) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, United Kingdom general election, 1992 (Wales), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Duke of Nonsense What is necessary for thee?. 17:56, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I've cited the briefing from the UK Parliament, I'm not exactly sure how that isn't independent or reliable. It's the same source as for dozens of other pages. FriendlyDataNerdV2 (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And I have to say, this is quite confusing given that another article with the exact same level of citations recieved a 'barnstar' from a user above. So this feels a bit unnecessary. FriendlyDataNerdV2 (talk) 18:00, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: United Kingdom general election, 1992 (Wales) has been accepted
 United Kingdom general election, 1992 (Wales), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! The Duke of Nonsense What is necessary for thee? 19:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=United_Kingdom_general_election,_1992_(Wales) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Twinkle
Hi, and thank you for your work on election and polling-related articles! I noticed that sometimes you had to undo unconstructive edits by IPs a few times in a row. To make reverting more convenient, I suggest you enable 'Twinkle' by going to Preferences→ Gadgets, and under Browsing tick the Twinkle box, then click Save at the bottom of the page. With Twinkle, you can revert numerous unconstructive edits just by clicking rollback once, or restore an article to any previous revision! Regards, J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 12:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, cheers for that! I'll be sure to check it out. All the best FriendlyDataNerdV2 (talk) 12:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Trust me, it just takes a few clicks to activate, and is very easy and convenient to use! J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 05:31, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1921 Irish elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Ireland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)