User talk:Friendly Engineer

Your submission at Articles for creation: The DEFCON Warning System (August 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The DEFCON Warning System and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_DEFCON_Warning_System Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curbon7&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_DEFCON_Warning_System reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I understand that the daily mail/express/star aren't brilliant sources and just used them to show that the DWS has been quoted by outside sources, I've gotten rid of them. However Media Bias Fact check shouldn't be ruled out. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77660-4 << Quoted by researchers as "While its credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems."
 * There is also precedent of using the website that the article is about as a source to make reference of (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AtariAge, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airliners.net , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacRumors).
 * I am asking that you take another look, if this request for appeal is not allowed then I apologise. Friendly Engineer (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The DEFCON Warning System has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The DEFCON Warning System. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 06:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Removed the external links. Friendly Engineer (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * However, I kept the one external link in the info box as the article is about a website, so I feel that it's appropriate to have a link to said website in the info box. Friendly Engineer (talk) 11:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Friendly Engineer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Friendly Engineer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:The DEFCON Warning System, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I would like to clarify that I have not received any money or gifts by the DEFCON Warning System. It's a purely voluntary role as a moderator, I made the DEFCON Warning System wiki page because I was a bit shocked to find that there was no page for it, I mean, DWS has been quoted by news articles and has over a quarter of a million twitter followers and more than 3000 forum members, and I believed this to be enough to sate wikipedia's notability requirements although perhaps I was wrong, I am new to wikipedia. - Friendly Engineer Friendly Engineer (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Friendly Engineer Even if you have not received money, from what you describe, I believe that you are considered by WP to have a conflict of interest because you are very close to the subject.. if I am right, you must makes COI declaration. Maybe an editor who is more experienced than I am can chime in. 71.228.112.175 (talk) 07:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Already made that declaration on both my user page and the draft page a while ago. Friendly Engineer (talk) 13:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * the draft talk page Friendly Engineer (talk) 13:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The DEFCON Warning System has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The DEFCON Warning System. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


 * So, if I remove everything and just put in a brief description backed up by media bias fact check and the bustle article and turn it into a stub it would be acceptable? Or does the website need to be quoted in more reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements? Friendly Engineer (talk) 20:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * When I say "backed up" I mean quoting directly from those two sources. Friendly Engineer (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The DEFCON Warning System
Hello, Friendly Engineer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The DEFCON Warning System, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)