User talk:Friendofkeith

March 2013
Hello, Friendofkeith. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Keith Green, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''Your user name, "Friendofkeith", and the exclusive nature of your edits is a bit of a red flag. Please take extra care when editing. Please provide references when possible. I know that your recent edit is correct, but it should still be referenced.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Do you need help with adding references? Take a look at Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. Thanks for helping to improve Wikipedia! Blessings. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=685775394 your edit] to Keith Green may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * authors David Wilkerson, Leonard Ravenhill, John Dawson and Winkie Pratney, most of whom lived in the area. The publication also later