User talk:Frip1000

Your edit to Articles for deletion/Alex Crockford
Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Crockford (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Sorry, missed the vandalism by one edit--Frip1000 23:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

CSD versus prod
I judged that Legrand Software is not a candidate for speedy deletion and replaced the templates with. You reverted that and I'm wondering why exactly. Am I misjudging the situation? &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 00:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You added link title to the bottom of the page--Frip1000 00:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah! How annoying. I think this mouse needs replacement. Thanks! &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 00:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

yea..
i was seeing what that button on vandalproof said because i didnt know. it was just a test. Wikipediarules2221 02:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page! Much appreciated. *~Daniel~* ☎ 03:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

David Henrie
Hello! I was just wondering why you reverted my edits on the trivia section in the David Henrie article. It looked very messy before I edited it, and the sentences were not of proper grammer. I have re-edited it so go take a look. Thanks! loulou 23:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)