User talk:FriskedLogic

I'm about to get into an edit war over the Diebold article. They have a long history of erasing controversial data, and I know an edit war is something I don't want to get into. I'm pretty new to the wikipedia thing, but I don't think a company should be able to remove evidence against it to a subsidiary controversy page, especially if the subsidiary is not publicly traded.
 * Hello, with a quick perusal of the issue, you may be interested in reading conversations on the Diebold talk page. Your concerns about the article may already be addressed there, if not you can always discuss the issue there. If that doesn't help, you could always ask for a request for comment. Let us know if you need more help. Have a nice day! - LA @ 07:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)