User talk:Fritz Bollmann

Erotic Lactation merge to Milk fetishism
I added the "merge to" tag to the Erotic lactation article again. Tags like that should not be removed until a consensus has been reached on the relevant talk page. My reasons for suggesting the merge can also be found there. Robotman1974 19:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Paraphilia template
I reverted the change you made to this template because the Erotic Lactation article, in my view, is still woefully incomplete and flawed. To start, the title must conform to Wikipedia rules, and as such the "l" in lactation should not be capitalised. See Manual of Style. Second, it still seems to me that the intent in creating this article is to give the topic a different name and significantly alter the information presented from what is currently at Milk fetishism. Again, this must be done according to Wikipedia standards. Please read Help:Moving a page. The way you are attempting to do this is wrong. Let me stress that I do not object to the subject matter or the information that is being presented in the new article. That is not my concern right now. You say you got "a lot of accordance" for this change. Can you provide evidence of this? If drastic changes such as the ones you are attempting are to be made, consensus must be garnered within the community of Wikipedia editors. Consensus or any kind of agreement reached on outside sites is simply irrelevant to issues involving edits at Wikipedia. I will ask for help from an administrator to help settle this, and I ask that you please do not make drastic changes that affect multiple articles until this issue is settled. Please don't hesitate to leave your thoughts on this matter on my talk page or on the articles' talk pages. Thanks. Robotman1974 13:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Milk fetishism
I reverted the changes you made to this talk page. It is of prime importance to leave all discussion visible on the talk page of an article so that records of the discussions are maintained. Comments must never be removed from talk pages. You must have misunderstood me when I suggested deleting sections from the Milk fetishism article that were duplicated on Erotic lactation. I was talking only about the article itself, not the talk pages. Robotman1974 12:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I also reverted the additions that were copy&pasted to Talk:Erotic lactation from Talk:Milk fetishism. To reiterate, the talk pages must remain intact to accurately reflect all discussion that occurs there. Robotman1974 12:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * UUps, embarrassing. Will never more occur. Is this a "technicla question" and is it right that any discussion will survive until "end of earth" no matter if relevant or not? --Fritz Bollmann 12:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Your message
Hey, I'm a bit swamped with school work right now but if I get time I will take a look at the new page and see if theres anything I can do. CloudedIce 20:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:MiniCouple.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MiniCouple.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk  21:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

File:AnrLogo.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:AnrLogo.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:26, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Edits in article 'Erotic Lactation': a reply
I am grateful for the discussion. As to the passage that "probably a citation isnt't really needed" for, my being a college student in Mathematics requires of me that affirmations have a concrete foundation. --Algorithme (talk) 17:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)