User talk:Fritz Saalfeld/Archive 3

Please notify uploader when you tag image as no source/no license
When you an image with those two tags, please also follow the template's instruction and notify the uploader. Many thanks. --WinHunter (talk) 12:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Maps
If they have been replaced with better maps: fine. However, if they've just been removed from the articles by people for no adequate reason, then they want putting back rather than deleting from the internet forever. Morwen - Talk 12:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Chess images
Don't mind at all--if they're orphaned, it's best that they're deleted. Go ahead. --Camembert 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Channelv.jpg
Feel free to delete, no longer used long replaced, however it was put under the right copyright license as far as I know seeing as it IS a logo. - Mike Beckham 10:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Libya Municipalites
Thank you for your enquiry, It was wrong of me not to give a reason for the deletes but yet the deletes are very valid. The reason I removed the images from the individual municipality pages is because the maps contained 26 municipalities whereas Libya now has 32 Image:Libya New Municipalities.png. It would just have been confusing for the readers if I left the old maps. If somebody wants to know the location of a particular municipality they can refer to the main Libya page. Hope it's not a problem Jaw101ie 18:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Quick image delete
Hey. I noticed that you're doing a lot of image work (lots of IFD nominations). I wanted to point quickimgdelete, a handy little javascript that speedies up the IFD process. You can copy the three scripts that you need from my monobook.js. Just post it in your monobook.js. In the toolbox, you can tage the images accordingly. Hbdragon88 21:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

RE: CA/SR shields
Hi,

Sure, they can all be removed as they have been eclipsed by SVGs. Thanks for doing this. atanamir 05:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Use of logos in Betelgeuse incident
Hello, Fritz. I am currently involved in a dispute with two editors about the use of the Gulf Oil logo in the Betelgeuse incident article. It seems to me that this logo does not significantly contribute to the article, and thus fails the eighth point of the Wikipedia fair-use policy. The Total logo has just recently been added to the article, and though I haven't yet said anything about it, I think this image also adds nothing significant. I would appreciate your opinion on the matter; the discussion is ongoing at Image talk:Gulf.png. Thank you for your time. —Bkell (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

subst
Hey there. Just a real quick minor thing, I modified one of your edits to add a subst to a template that you'd added to a user talk page. Not a biggie but just wanted to let you know what I'd done and why I'd done it...! Cheers, Budgiekiller 20:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the deletion note, but the html...
Thanks for the note about an image that I uploaded or edited being deleted. One small note: there was no need to give your comment a special background colour, it was no more important than the comments of other wikipedians who edited my page. But thanks for the note anyway. Gronky 14:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I see now that the obnoxious html is part of a template, so I've left a comment there. Gronky 14:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Simply a curiosity
I've checked your contrib page and noticed you spend ALL time checking images here. Don't you get bored? Don't you ever feel the necessity to add some constructive contain to Wikipedia? Ciao and good work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Attilios (talk • contribs).
 * Ah, OK. Can I ask your help for copyedit of my short article at C'eravamo tanto amati. I'm not of English motherlanguage. Ciao and good work--Attilios 13:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Bot on stamps
Hi Fritz, Can you please run the bot on Category:Fair use stamp images? A lot of them are orphaned, as they have been removed from articles where fair use doesn't apply. Thanks. --Ragib 01:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice
Hi! I am working lately in the List of films and have uploaded only few missing images for film infoboxes and always care to tag them and state source. It is however the second time that another user finds an earlier original movie poster and swaps it. If I keep contributing missing images which then get orphaned, is there anyway to avoid getting messages in my talk page, or is it standard practice? Hoverfish 10:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC) By the way Image:TheMagicChristian.jpg has also been orphaned for the same reason, but it has not been tagged for deletion. Can you please tag it so? Hoverfish 10:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Training Squadron 10
hi there, thanks for the orphaned image notice...it was part of an entry that was erroneously deleted by overzealous persons [long story]..anyway, i have rebuilt the entry..and attempted to put he image back in, but for soem reason it won't work for me...I am not he best with adding images....i did however remove the tag on the image that you had asked to be removed. thanks for your kind help... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bondoa6 (talk • contribs).

Crazy (Gnarls Barkley song)
It is not my responsibility to find the reference. If you want that included on the page then you need to find it yourself. I have added Crazy (Gnarls Barkley song) to my watchlist. KazakhPol 20:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I have removed four references that were either broken or did not mention Barkley's Crazy. You may re-add the mention of Furtado covering the song as the reference currently listed as 13 supports that. Regards, KazakhPol 21:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You need to stop trying to intimidate me. WP:BLP applies here, so those policies are moot. KazakhPol 16:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you are misunderstanding... WP:BLP applies here because the unsourced claim that Billy Idol covered this song could easily be seen as a negative statement. The page in question does not have to be a biography for WP:BLP to apply. The page only needs to have unsourced, negative claims about a living invidual. Reference #20 still does not mention Billy Idol covering the song. I want you to either remove his name, point out where on the page currently referenced it mentions Crazy, or find a reference that shows Idol covered the song. KazakhPol 19:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. KazakhPol 00:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

RE:Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jimmy Celebrates "Sweetest Day".JPEG)
The license was wrong on the image (it isn't fair use... it is public domain). I've updated it.--Isotope23 19:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * ...or at least I think it is. Scan of a document that is in the public domain.  Would that be public domain as well or fair use?--Isotope23 19:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Orphaned fair use image (Image:24-conspiracypicep2.jpg)
Go ahead and delete this and any Conspiracy pics I uploaded that aren't in use. I've won't be using them in the near future anyway. --Twlighter 20:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

No Cover Available Issue
Thank you Fritz, I replied to your message at Image talk:Nocover.jpg. --Aston 09:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:LiIon 300x165.jpg
Thank you for your message to me requesting copyright status on this image, as I understand the concern of not having infringing images on Wikipedia. It is one of the few that I have uploaded that I failed to include a provenance. This image has been marked with a note indicating I took the picture and that it is not copyrighted. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) 18:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

notice
Thanks for the heads up! I got the deleted file off a DoD site soon after Saddam was caught. However, since the pic is on Commons, it's best to let it go to the big hard drive in the sky. :) - Thanks, Hoshie 20:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Romy Schneider is Sissi
Dear Fritz,

For the benefit of those who do not speak German, I write this in English.

Thanks for your message concerning Image:Romy Schneider is Sissi.JPG. As you might guess from looking at my talk page (including the archived portions), I'm sick and tired of canned messages like the one you sent me: Ever since those tags were introduced, I have always carefully tried to state all the required details. It's just annoying having to read all sorts of things which just do not apply.

What happened is this:

(1) Only two days ago, some fool plays around with the Elizabeth of Bavaria page and&mdash;carelessly, unintentionally, on purpose, whatever&mdash;and while doing so removes a simple videotape cover (no problems copyright-wise whatsoever) from the page.

(2) You come along and, instead of reverting, say it is not used in any article, and tag it accordingly.

(3) You send me the message that "it has been tagged" (as if it hadn't been you yourself who tagged it) and that it will be deleted after seven days.

(4) I send you this reply and revert the last few edits.

By simply checking the Elizabeth of Bavaria edit history, you might have found out yourself, and doing so wouldn't have taken up more of your precious time than doing what you actually did. If I were on holiday just now, the image would be irrevocably lost. Quite a few images go down the drain that way, something which could easily be avoided.

By the way: It is "I have been a Wikipedian since ...", not "I am ...".

Best wishes, &lt;KF&gt; 22:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks again for your answer, which only shows me how dangerous Special:Unusedimages is. Apart from its being mysteriously titled "Unused files" and apart from the initial warning ("Other web sites may link to a file with a direct URL, and so may still be listed here despite being in active use"), the first random example I checked, Image:Zapata.JPG, uploaded ages ago by Infrogmation, after some checking of mine appears to be used after all&mdash;see Emiliano Zapata&mdash;though in a modified form (Image:Zapata.png). There, however, the contributor who modified it failed to mention the source ("photo of Emiliano and Euphemio Zapata, from early 1910s source"), so next someone will add a tag saying "no source" to the one and someone else will add a tag saying "not being used" to the other image, and both will be deleted. It only goes to show that anyone working from this list (whose point I fail to grasp in the first place) has to be very very careful. Best wishes, &lt;KF&gt; 16:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Comics Collaboration of the Month
You supported Peanuts, which has been selected as the Comics WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. Steve block Talk 20:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Zach Braff.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zach Braff.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Rossrs 03:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EBOccupStamps1.jpg)
Thank you for your note. The image was removed by what I understand is called a bot, and I really didn't feel like fighting some sort of inanimate piece of code. I think the image is fair use and have attempted to describe it thus. I will put it back in, as you suggest, but if it is removed again I'm not going to fight. I have better things to do, like improving entries on things I know about. It seems to me that it would be good if there was some sort of editorial decision making in this sort of case, and I hope that you are that person. (Added later: it seems that Man Vyi has put it back in form me. Excellent)  Best wishes. Ah1954 16:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Unusual Question
Thanks for your reply. I am not 100% sure that it does, actually fail: " No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information. ", since he isn't playing the instrument he is known for (i.e. "same information" is arguably not met: he's not playing the "right" instrument). Please note: I'm certainly not objecting to the image's deletion, just wondering whether an expanded article would have a rationale to include it some time in the future. This is an academic question, and i'd like very much to get your input. I certainly don't mind in the slightest that a commercial image is being deleted, in favor of an image that i took; and after all, it was I who removed the Fair Use image from the article in the first place. Not being a lawyer, I would still think that in an expanded article about Kevin Crawford, this image might be useful, at least until somebody photographs him playing the flute. Again, I'm not protesting the image's deletion, just trying to get your input on its possible inclusion in the future. Many thanks for your input! --Storkk 14:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information and the link to the discussion... That's what I was looking for. Cheers, Storkk 18:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Images uploaded by User:Vinaixa67
Well, I've blocked the user for 48 hours. I don't know...English doesn't appear to be his/her first language, so I was hesitant about blocking before, but (s)he said she'd provide the necessary source and copyright information for images after (s)he was blocked the last time and (s)he hasn't done so. I've tagged the images Image:Lucie Silvas - Last Year -Single- (2006).jpg and Image:RBD - Bésame Sin Miedo -Single- (2006).jpg as unsourced. Extraordinary Machine 21:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Unspecified source for Image:Hwtbflinst.jpg
I can't answer the question. Please ask the original uploader. I merely modified the image.--Jiang 18:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Stco23
Thank You for keeping those things on for me while I was recovering for my injury. I have taking off those things you put on because I have made a DVD article about Crash and have put those pictures on that article. I am 100% yet and won't be for a least a year but I am feeling better and I am using both hands to type this message. I am going back to wikipedia full time. Thank You very much. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stco23 (talk • contribs).

Watermarking question
Most of the images 3dscience has been providing are large and expensive. How do you suggest we provide these high-quality images and not give the store away? We're open to any suggestions you might have, although water-marking is easy we might come across as being too promotional.

Thanks!

3dscience 18:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

(talk - contribs)

Crazy article
Hello! I added the songs "Crazy You" and "Let's Go Crazy" by Prince to the crazy article. I've noticed that you deleted them. Following the format of other wikipedia articles I've seen, I added a "See also" section since those songs have the word crazy in their title. As you could see I also added to this section the song "(You Drive Me) Crazy" by Britney Spears since the title of that song is not just the word "Crazy" as the songs listed in the "In Music" section of the article. In my opinion the "Crazy" article should be as it was before you deleted the "See also" section".

Please read the "See also" section of the Wikipedia: Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) MoS:DP. I would like to read your opinion about my point of view on the "See also" section of the "Crazy" article.

Thanks!

JediCarlos 16:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wheatus 2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wheatus 2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok  ☠  20:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Steveolaf.PNG
Go ahead and delete Image:Steveolaf.PNG. It was used in the 2006 Fox journalists kidnapping article, but someone replaced it a while ago without the Fox News footer. Hello32020 21:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MGS3_OST%28JP%29.jpg
Completely forgot about that one. It seems I uploaded it before I finally chose the correct image to place on the respective article and never deleted it. I'll have no qualms regarding its deletion. Thanks for the reminder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MGS3_OST%28JP%29.jpg. (FF7SquallStrife7 21:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC))

Image:1156196235.jpeg
Orphaned image: please feel free to delete it. Thanks. Orbicle 12:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Keith Lemon image
Its not in use because I have uploaded another image that is larger and of better quality. I don't mind if the old one is deleted.
 * Mr. Garrison 13:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:FFDplaybill2006.JPG
Thank you for your message. Yes: this image file (Image:FFDplaybill2006.JPG) can be deleted. J. Van Meter 14:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:OutOfTowners.jpg
The image had been added to the article for The Out-of- Towners and then removed by someone simply because he preferred his image. I have added it back. However, when I uploaded it, I specified it was a video cover, and that info appears on the image's page. I was under the impression a video cover was an acceptable image. . . am I incorrect in thinking so? If so, why is it listed as one of the licensing options in the dropdown menu? Thanks! SFTVLGUY2 14:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I am aware of WikiProject Films' style guidelines. However, isn't the clarity of the image also a concern? If a DVD cover image is sharper than that of the original film poster, wouldn't that take precedence? Thanks! SFTVLGUY2 15:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Image: Oni-Fied_Giroro
If your gonna delete it then go ahead, it came out all wrong in the first place. SoundPound500000 November 26, 2006 10:26 a.m.

Delete
go ahead and delete Image:Lifespring-book.jpg. I ended up using another image for the article. Jeffpw 16:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Dark Lady Image
Thanks for the note about the image. I had used it in the Rosalind Franklin article, but someone thought it was not fair use to use it in that article so it got removed. Please feel free to delete it if you want. Alun 17:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Orphaned fair use image (Image:BoxTorrents.PNG)
Thanks for letting me know. Apparently, BoxTorrents.com was deleted through an AfD (see Articles for deletion/BoxTorrents.com (2nd)). There's no need for the image anymore, so I'm going to go ahead and delete it. Thanks again for letting me know about this.  Nish kid 64  17:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: WEBBWIN
Hi, I am unsure what to do in this matter. I would appreciate your advice. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dhwani1989 (talk • contribs).

Orphaned fair use image (Image:UN-flag-square.png)
Aye, there's no reason to keep it.  Bl a  st  11.26.06 1245 (UTC -5)

Re: Re: WEBBWIN
You wrote: "you should check the article you uploaded the image for, and reinclude it." I want to include the image within the article. What do you mean by checking the article and reincluding it? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dhwani1989 (talk • contribs).


 * Point Taken, but the image has not been removed. I checked the article a couple of minutes ago. Does this mean that I have to anything else? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dhwani1989 (talk • contribs).

Dhwani1989 18:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC) Maybe so. So, should I do something about it? or just leave it alone. Thanks for the help.

Dhwani1989 18:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC) Yes, it seems that someone put up an identical copy. Thanks!

STS-125 image
I just cant get what is the issue with the STS-125 image. This is a NASA - US Govt image and the source is provided. So what is the problem.Hektor 18:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Carbon - screen of the demo.png
Ops, i have uploaded this image some weeks ago but someone has replaced this image in the article with a new one so i have thought that my old image was deleted. I don't know any administrator in the English Wikipedia, so, could you ask to an administrator to delete it (if you aren't an administrator)? Thanx, [  F i l n i k  |  Talk!  | Discus ]  18:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC) P.S. Excuse me for my bad English :)


 * Ok, thanx :) [  F i l n i k  |  Talk!  | Discus ]  18:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Stema Cluj.PNG)
The image Stema Cluj.PNG is used in the page Cluj County, as you can see. I cannot explain why it is seen as an orphaned image. Thank you, ES Vic 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

There must be some sort of mistake
I delete that picture of lee haney and monica brant a long time ago.Angel,Isaac 20:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

(Image:UCR logo.JPG)
I linked this image to University of California, Riverside. Feel free to delete the others, I was having trouble uploading, for some reason my browser wouldn't display the image properly. Sorry for the trouble. Best,--Amerique dialectics 20:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned Images
Thank you for noting the vandalism on my pages.TonyTheTiger 21:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Fritz. I originally uploaded the starvationtamtam.gif image and then linked the Starvation/Tam Tam Pour L'Ethiopie article to it. However this didn't work (i.e. the image didn't display), so I uploaded it as a jpg instead and this did work. Therefore the gif is no longer required and can be deleted. I haven't uploaded any other images to Wikipedia as yet. MFlet1 21:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rt2 1088116386-00 Leila.gif)
Thanks for the reminder. The image is orphaned because its jpeg counterpart is used in the respective article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FF7SquallStrife7 (talk • contribs).

Orphaned fair use image
(Image:TheUnit s02e04.jpg) (Image:The Unit ep 206.jpg)

Hi, yes these are orphaned images waiting to be deleted. Is there a way for users to delete their erroneous uploaded images or anything that should be done to ensure their deletion? I think it would be helpful if you appended a section to your notice that says: "What to do if you want the image to be deleted: ...". Al001 22:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me about the db-author template - I knew there was probably something I should do but I didn't find it when I looked. Al001 20:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

The Picture
You messaged me about a picture. I swear a put a copyright on it, but at the same time, I don't even remember uploading it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Musicfreak7676 (talk • contribs).

Naked Snake picture
It's used in the Big Boss article.--Snake Liquid 00:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay, I remember now. Delete the picture in question.--Snake Liquid 01:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Orphaned fair use image (Image:Adultswim-tagline.PNG)
Go ahead and delete the image. Thanks for checking in on that. --Sirkan 02:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logo-jo-albertville-1992.gif)
Hi, the image can be deleted because a similar image is already available. Cheers, Madder 02:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use images
Re: Image:BSG-Husker-Viper1.jpg & Image:BSGMini-00_10_37-part.jpg: I had uploaded them to support a debate over the proper spelling of a fictional callsign, but I didn't know how to create a wikilink to images without including the image inline, so I linked them as external links instead. I uploaded them to use in a comment on this user talk page. I can change the links to wikilinks, if the use is appropriate. The callsign in question gets changed back and forth every now and then, so it may be useful to have something to document the proper spelling. I'm not very experienced with image use on Wikipedia, so I appreciate any guidance you could provide. -- Fru1tbat 02:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Jeff Smith photo
It's an excellent shot! Well done, and thanks for contributing it. -leigh (&#966;&#952;&#8057;&#947;&#947;&#959;&#962;) 11:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Thurgarton pic
Your comment to me has been passed on to user Celithemis who tagged the pic. Hopefully that person will respond to you directly as I do not know what you are talking about. I have never tagged a pic in my life! thanks Peter morrell 15:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

This is where the pic comes from: is that enough? thanks Peter morrell 16:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use images (Image:TF-label A.gif, Image:MM-D-inner.jpg)
These are surplus uploads and can be deleted immediately. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ricadus (talk • contribs).

WP Munich
 Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?
 * You can join a Task Force.
 * You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
 * You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
 * You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
 * You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
 * You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
 * You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
 * You can help reference articles.
 * Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
 * You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.

 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kingjeff (talk • contribs).

Orphaned images (Image:Pakistan fa.png, Image:Tunisia fa.gif)
These are not used in another articles, because these are the new logos of FAs. All new logos are being orphaned? Come on... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jurosik (talk • contribs).

RE Orphaned fair use image (Image:Esslogosmall.gif)
Hey, the article that the image was on was deleted, delete the image or whatever is required i don't care. --Mckeznak 23:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Stark(species).jpg
meh, I thought it was something, and I was completely wrong, delete it as soon as possible.Phoenix741 01:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Remixed & Rare (Mantronix).jpg)
There were problems viewing the uploaded image on the Mantronix page, so I uploaded the same image without the ampersand (which corrected the problem). This old image needs to be deleted (I wish there was a way I could do it and avoid these issues altogether). Thanks for the notice though. Sundevilesq 02:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bombay.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bombay.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Fritz S. (Talk) 23:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No, they prefer to be called Mumbai now. Delete away. Metarhyme 18:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Richard & Mary Parker image
Hi. I wasn't quite sure how to go about providing the additional information needed RE: Image:Richard and Mary Parker UToSM-1 headshots.jpg. Comic-book covers are used all over Wikipedia, and there's a category for them in the image-upload pulldown menu -- which I'd thought I'd checked, but maybe I missed it. Anyway, the additional info:

These two images comprise much less than an entire comic-book cover -- they're just two cropped portions that directly illustrate Richard & Mary Parker for their entry in List of S.H.I.E.L.D. members. I'm not quite sure what I did wrong, and nothing in the provided links told me specifically why these two cropped images illustrating the characters' entry wouldn't fly. Help! :-) --Tenebrae 22:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Wait, I see what happened
The day I uploaded the cropped images, I think there were some server glitches or a database lockup or something, and my uploads didn't appear to be uploading.

The image eventually used at List of S.H.I.E.L.D. members is actually titled Image:Richard and Mary Parker UTo-headshots2.jpg. Anything else can totally be deleted. My apologies for the mixup! --Tenebrae 22:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete
Yeah delete, the article was deleted too. We eventually started our own wiki, hosted by Media Wiki. [wikifoot.de.vu]. delete it Adam Wang 00:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Orwell1984Penguin.jpg)
Hi, the image was on an article, a gallery of book covers, but after discussion we agreed that the article should be deleted, which it has been done. You can delete this image as soon as you want. Regards, GiantSnowman 12:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Yasmine Bleeth mugshot.jpg
Thanks, I didn't know there was a template for this. AnonEMouse (squeak) 15:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Smiley Award
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward