User talk:FrogStomp

This is the part where you leave comments. Press the + tab on top of the screen.

matt
hey matt whats going on. i like how u deisided to be different the rest of the world and deside not use a myspace or facebook and use this thing instead. well tichon was fun and well intresting by the way sorry about all the " confussion" but anyway yeah. lol rock on

-leah

New votes on Jewish articles
Hi FrogStomp: The votes that were cast about the recent Jewish articles were stopped and relisted for a new ("2nd") vote, all can now be found at Articles for deletion/Jewish summer camps and local organizations. Best wishes. IZAK 06:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Deleting Amitz
Hi, because you were involved with the article, you may want to look at Articles for deletion/Amitiz (2nd nomination), best wishes, IZAK 14:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

imagine a situation
i would've said pixies and yo la tengo/yeah yeah yeahs. also, x = xiu xiu.

besides, on a slightly different tangent, how would merely purchasing a shirt really help (otherwise, the girl could've just donated money without receiving a shirt) anyway? does compensation take away the altruism of the act -- or is it even coercion to offer incentives for something supposedly purely voluntary and selfless? seeing as the goal of spreading the true message on a higher, more involved level was not exactly achieved, the promotion of the charity could be translated to a form of advertising or pressure; the shirts a tool of attracting money.

if the precise success of the charity is measured in solely monetary means, then it wouldn't matter the motivations behind the donation anyway, because ultimately the money is what it is. however, the true aim of the greater realization of the message about prevention, social action, and human nature, etc. fails, as genocide is trivialized into a mere trend. the ethics of economics often are quite muddled. does the overall impact outweigh the rest? yes, if you're machiavelli. the ends does justify the means, as per utilitarianism (to which i subscribe). but in this case, personal/individual morality perhaps might not have an overwhelming role anyway, as the ignorance of the others is more or less harmless in the grand scheme. so maybe it's not quite a paradoxical question. a probably better situation would have been if the donations of the "preppy kids" had a tangibly disadvantageous or especially 'immoral' effect, which it might indeed, but i fail to recognize it. still, that would pretty much piss me off if that actually happened [see: the ONE bracelets].

blah blah blah

moreover, the more important question is that if electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons? obvs

if you're into modest mouse, maybe you should check out isaac brock's side project, ugly casanova, if you haven't already.

Ska and related articles
I'm not reaally sure what the best option is, in terms of possibly merging Ska, Ska punk and Third wave ska, however, the weakest article of the three is the Third wave ska article. It does not adequately define the subject, and merely duplicates content that is in the other two articles.Spylab 11:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

lolz
hi matt

alphabet of music
x should be xiu xiu and y should be yo la tengo. or maybe yeah yeah yeahs, if you like them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.145.119.74 (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC).

A tag has been placed on Coquette (restaurant), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 07:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)