User talk:FroggleRocksaur

William Blake Love's Secret
A tag has been placed on William Blake Love's Secret, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Spiesr (talk) 20:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Spiesr (talk) 20:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Love's Secret
A tag has been placed on Love's Secret requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 20:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Poem article
Hi.. we can certainly have encyclopedia articles about poems, but they should be just that- encyclopedia articles. I believe there's another project for source material like the contents of the poem. Let's see here, yes, wikisource.org I think is the right place for this. (Obviously we must observe copyright, but with one of Blake's works I don't think this is a concern.) Friday (talk) 20:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to William Blake Love's Secret constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tresiden (talk) 21:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)