User talk:Froglingoman

Froglingo
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Froglingo, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/86409.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Froglingo


A tag has been placed on Froglingo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elizium23 (talk) 04:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Froglingo
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Froglingo, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/86409.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Froglingo


A tag has been placed on Froglingo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elizium23 (talk) 20:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Froglingo
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Froglingo, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://osdir.com/ml/haskell-cafe@haskell.org/2011-02/msg00527.html. As a copyright violation, Froglingo appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Froglingo has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Froglingo and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Froglingo with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Froglingo.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Acabashi (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

'''To re-affirm - stop posting articles in contravention of Copyright violations policy. If you carry-on doing this, you will be blocked indefinitely from editing''' Acabashi (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for repeated postings of copyright violations and advertising
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

{unblock-spamun|AdditionPLT|Also, the text I copied and pasted was just a try-out and I intended to replace it eventually. Again I was trying out the Wikipedia system. Sorry again.}
 * I'm concerned because you seem to be interested in Wikipedia only to create an article about "Froglingo," but I did a search of my own, and wasn't able to find any reliable sources verifying that Froglingo would meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I would hate to unblock you to create a new username, only to re-block you for creating inappropriate articles.  Could you read the rules I've linked, and then let us know whether you still want a Wikipedia account, and what you'd do with it? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It would also be helpful if you read the conflict of interest guidelines. If you're associated with Froglingo directly, then it wouldn't be appropriate for you to write the article about this subject- instead, you'd trust that more neutral people would think it was important and write about it.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * As far as I can determine, your attempted article Froglingo is about a subject which lacks wikipedic notability. If this remains the case, the article will not survive in wikipedia. On that assumption, do you want to contribute on any other topic? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

{tl|unblock-spamun|AdditionPLT|Froglingo is a new programming language which involves many new concepts including a language equivalent to a class of total recursive functions. Therefore it should be notable in your Wikipedia. The planned article Froglingo is based on many published research papers. One example is "Assessing Easiness with Froglingo", The Second International Conference on the Application of Digital Information and Web Technologies, 2009, page 847 - 849. See more published papers cited at the website: http://www.froglingo.com/documents.html. I am not associated with the organization, but an individual inspired by a recent post on Haskill Cafe. If I am allowed, I am also planning to edit more articles relevant to the new theories out of Froglingo. Thank you for your understanding. Froglingoman (talk) 04:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)}
 * Please don't continue placing unblock templates. One is sufficient to place you into the category. You can just make regular replies to anything else. The concern here is that Froglingo doesn't seem to be supported by unrelated sources (the research paper you cite appears to be written by the same person as the author of the language). Notability requires that people who don't have a vested interest in the subject have covered it. To be honest, Froglingo really doesn't seem to be quite fully baked, and its website isn't so much as even grammatically correct yet. It's an interesting project, but probably not one that's attracted the requisite level of third-party coverage on it, let alone on "theories from it" (and we do not allow posting of no original research, only of theories published and discussed by reputable, unrelated third parties). The question you were asked is if you intend to do something other than push Froglingo. If the answer is no, there's really nothing for you to do here, as the subject fails our inclusion guidelines. If that's the case, you might want to consider an alternative website that would allow the posting of what you want. If you would like to edit something else here, you need to say what else it is to intend to do. You've already been told several times Froglingo wouldn't be an appropriate topic, and at this time, that answer is effectively final. Maybe that will change in the future if the language grows and does get significant coverage from unrelated parties, but it won't today no matter how hard you push. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Got your points. It would be interesting to know which areas of Froglingo taste uncooked to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Froglingoman (talk • contribs)
 * The word 'uncooked' is not relevant to Wikipedia's notability criteria. In what way do you think this subject meets the notability criteria?  What independent reliable sources verify that? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)