User talk:Fromcs

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alicante province (November 9)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Alicante_province Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No content. This redirect already exists.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your edits in the page Castellón de la Plana
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Castellón de la Plana. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucenseLugo (talk • contribs) 18:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * You have added unsourced content in the page Castellón de la Plana despite being asked for a source 1 week ago. Your edit counts as WP:DISRUPTIVE so a re-revert doesn't even count, in fact, yours do as you re-add unsourced text to Wikipedia and you still insist in doing it so.


 * Additionally, I have replied and mentioned you on the article's talk page and you lied on your Edit summary saying I didn't engage in the talk page, which is not a good movement as all wikiedits remain registered as you might know. --LucenseLugo (talk) 18:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * OMG. I said you did not consensuate it, not that you did not go to the talk page. Read well what I say. Consensuating means discussing stuff before making any changes, which is precisely what you did not do--Fromcs (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Please stop using external talk pages to do Personal attacks or disruptive edits. Now you made a RfC and that's serious, don't use a WP:RFC as a throwing weapon because not only other users won't take you seriously, but also because that's just something to oppose or support your change. If you do that and an administrator sees you, I think you can guess what goes next.
 * And no, deleting unsourced content which was asked 1 week ago for a source doesn't count in your WP:CONSENSUS claim, consensus have to be made regarding changes based on sources. Not on changes lacking any sources. Poorly sourced content is not acceptable on Wikipedia, let alone completely unsourced one. LucenseLugo (talk) 19:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive editing in the page Costa del Azahar
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Costa del Azahar, you may be blocked from editing. I have been trying to help you and to make you understand how things work. You got to solve a content dispute by proving up your point with reliable sources, there is no "wait for consensus" when something gets deleted because it's unreferenced (no sources) and more if you don't even engage in the talk page. Stop being WP:DISRUPTIVE and stop doing WP:SYNTH and first provide your examples in the talk page to see if they are valid or not. In your last change, not only that you've added unsourced text back, you also used 2 random sources that didn't back up any of the changes from your new content. For your own good, please read WP:RS and WP:GUIDELINES before doing further edits in the English Wikipedia. LucenseLugo (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Concern regarding Draft:Alicante province
Hello, Fromcs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alicante province, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Alicante province


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Alicante province, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)