User talk:FrozenMayham

July 2017
On Wikipedia, because things like music genre are so subjective and can lead to endless arguing, we usually go by what reliable sources, like music journalists, say on the matter. As such, please stop using your own opinions as a trump over what sources say. Also, rather than continually reverting people's edits, please start discussing on talk pages instead.

If you don't stop this behavior, you'll likely be blocked from editing, so please take this warning to heart. Sergecross73  msg me  15:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Most sources would say nickelback is Rock,hard rock at most but metal i've never ever heard Nickelback ever called metal in any sense by anyone that is why i made the change to begin with — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrozenMayham (talk • contribs)
 * Yes, and as I just explained, that doesn't matter - we go by what reliable sources say. There's at least 3 sources in the Nickelback article for "alternative metal" presently, and there are more out there. Metacritic classifies them as alt metal as well. It's probably not their primary genre, no, but the Wikipedia article isn't claiming that to be the case either. It's merely one of many genre listed in a list and paragraph in the article. Sergecross73   msg me  13:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification,just a little annoying when you see a bands genre as something they really aren't — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrozenMayham (talk • contribs)
 * I understand. Its equally irritating for experienced Wikipedia editors have to deal with self-proclaimed experts who disregard the website's policies to change things according to their own subjective standards. It'd be constant chaos if everyone approached it that way. Sergecross73   msg me  20:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enter the Realm


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Enter the Realm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)