User talk:Frozen Jese

Welcome to my talk page.

May 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Fixing a Hole, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  freshacconci  (✉) 14:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Sundayclose, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 22:34, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=6ybvGHdBVVUDi1D_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_8BTwx4ZgItogAM5&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Random personnel changes
Do you have a reliable source for any of these changes you are making in the "Personnel" sections of articles? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at All Together Now. Sundayclose (talk) 23:50, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mrs. Robinson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 03:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC) I'm sorry? That was not vandalism and you know it. If you want the long and short of it, I was adding material I had read up some time ago but couldn't find the source (in case you were wondering, yes, some people still read books!) I know I was being a bit hasty with my addition, but that's no warrant for a block. --Frozen Jese (talk) 20:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * After you ignore numerous warnings for adding unsourced material, yes it is vandalism. That's why there is no level five warning template for unsourced edits: the vandalism warning is used. If you think you can't be blocked for making unsourced edits after the string of warnings you have received, you are in for a rude awakening. You may find this hard to believe, but there actually is a policy against making unsourced edits, especially after warnings. But regardless of what you call it, repeatedly adding unsourced material after many warnings is every much a blockable offense as is vandalism. You are skating on thin ice. Next time there won't be a warning of any kind; I go straight to WP:AIV. Then we'll see how far your "It's not vandalism" argument will get you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)