User talk:Fruff71

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Ian Condon (November 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patrick Ian Condon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Patrick_Ian_Condon Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Johannes_Maximilian&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Patrick_Ian_Condon reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Johannes, Thanks for reviewing our draft so quickly and for your feedback. Maybe it would be better if we simply deleted the qualifications, as I am not sure
 * a) if they are necessary and
 * b) how we would improve them. We could add more detail, but I am not sure that is of any interest to the reader.
 * Best regards
 * Fiona Fruff71 (talk) 03:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Patrick Ian Condon
Hello, Fruff71. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrick Ian Condon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Patrick Ian Condon


Hello, Fruff71. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patrick Ian Condon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Ian Condon (November 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patrick Ian Condon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Patrick_Ian_Condon Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Patrick_Ian_Condon reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Vanderwaalforces, Thanks for your nice message, despite the rejection. Yes I am very disappointed and I am having trouble understanding what I need to change. You give us two reasons for the rejection:
 * All claims must be backed up by citations to reliable sources and are independent. In our opinion, we have done exactly that. Every award and every qualification are linked to a secondary source. Where is that not the case?
 * Remove the external links in the prose: Do you mean we should not simply link our claim to a secondary source using the Link button, but rather use the Citation button?
 * I would be grateful for any help you can provide. Thanks. Fiona / Fruff71 Fruff71 (talk) 08:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)