User talk:Fruit&Fibre

Sockpuppet investigation
 Velella  Velella Talk 10:56, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The user seams to understand the policy now. Can someone take a look, as this is a checkuser block?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * We should not consider unblocking this account until the user has disclosed which accounts were operated by them.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The only accounts I have ever operated are FibreNut and Fruit&Fibre. The other accounts mentioned in the original sockpuppet investigation that resulted in my blocking are not, and have never been, operated by myself. I believe some of them to be operated by my colleagues, but I have never operated any account other that those I have just mentioned. The reason for my creating Fruit&Fibre was purely down to password loss for FibreNut, which I have no intention of using again. I hope this helps. Fruit&#38;Fibre (talk) 10:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Is this helpful?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see the point of unblocking a user whose sole purpose is to "improve" the article about the company he works for. That certainly wasn't what all those accounts were doing when they were editing - they were instead adding promotional material. So, this user is going to request edits, other editors will have to evaluate the proposed edits, and no doubt say no to them? Like many articles on Wikipedia, it will not be improved by the biased input of conflicted users. The article was created by a company PR person and has been generally edited by other reps of the company. I'm not even sure the company is notable. I've removed the checkuser request as, regardless, there's no need for it. All that said,, if you want to take this to WP:AN to get a consensus on whether the user should be unblocked, I'm fine with letting the community decide, even though it's much earlier than the SO period.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello. I would like to, if I may, point out that previous edits were made before I was fully aware of the WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO policies so I don't agree fully that this is a good indicator of future input. In addition, I think it is premature to assume my proposed edits will be rejected before I have had the chance to request them. And, although I would like to use this account to propose edits on this particular page, that is not to say that this will be the only page I hope to improve (I have not committed myself to being a single-use account). I would very much like to be treated with the same assumption of good faith that is referenced in the following behavioural guideline. I hope you'll reconsider my request - I am new here but I am trying to do it right.Fruit&#38;Fibre (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)