User talk:Fryism

May 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chilton Trinity School— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chilton Trinity School. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chilton Trinity School was changed by Fryism (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955913 on 2019-05-06T13:28:45+00:00

Negative comments
Can you stop attack me with your negativity and horrible comments? I am trying to succeed at becoming better at this and perhaps try to make a page on here myself, so therefore your meanness is not helping me. Fryism (talk) 13:50, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, Fryism. I'm a host at the Teahouse where we aim to assist new users. Drop by if you ever need assistance. The first two warning you received from were quite justified - there was no meanness intended. See this and this. If you want to test your ability to edit, feel free to use your sandbox (there's a link to it at the top of each page). I have checked your other edits, and reverted a couple just because they weren't hugely helpful. But please don't accuse others of being mean to you if you make silly edits like you've just did and we then have to spend our time undoing them. But you are doing the right thing by only making small edits to begin with. Just make sure, please, that each one does actually improve an article. If you want to understand how to edit Wikipedia, why not try out our interactive tour called  The Wikipedia Adventure? Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Excuse me
Thankyou for your reply but i feel bad that Serol is personally attacking me. Is is just because I worship the religion of Fryism and you do not? I am not an outsider why can’t you just accept me as I am not many people do anyway but i wanted to be friends and was just being nice with my contributions! Fryism (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * There's no need to start a new topic when you want to reply to someone. Just indent your reply with an additional colon.
 * The messages you received were semi-automated; no meanness intended. Had you continued to add further bad edits and/or your personal opinions into articles, you would have received two more - each of increasing severity - before further silly editing would result in your account being reported to an admin. And then you would probably be blocked from all further editing. I will ignore your comment about Fryism and religion. Sounds childish to me. Just remember this is a serious encyclopaedia. We welcome sensible edits and aim to support sensible editors; we block silly ones. Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

I don’t want to do that
Hello again

How dare you insult my religion and call it childish perhaps if you want to know more you could just ask it’s not hard my lord and saviour Fry would be very disappointed. Childish? Well you are- Fryism (talk) 14:48, 6 May 2019 (UTC)