User talk:Fstop22

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  — fetch ·  comms   02:23, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Granular Configuration Automation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia!  My 76 Strat  01:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 11:14, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

How do you want to contribute? 331dot (talk) 10:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Only minor edits to existing pages and paying careful attention to Wikepedia guidelines
 * What existing pages do you want to edit, or what topic areas are you interested in? What Wikipedia guidelines have you broken, and what steps will you take to follow them in the future?  Unless you are prepared to give specific answers to these questions, it will be hard to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The Wikipedia guidelines that I transgressed were publishing an article that appears promotional or like an advertisement. The steps I am taking to follow in the future is carefully reviewing Wikipedia guidelines and to not write directly about specific companies. I want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia and edit some specific concepts on existing pages like Telecom Transformation, Software-defined networking, Network virtualization platform, Network service.Fstop22 (talk) 6:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I will give you the chance to show that you can make a constructive, substantive contribution(not just fixing spelling or grammar). This is simply an option I am giving you- you are free to request unblock to see if you can convince someone to unblock you without doing so if you wish. 331dot (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. However I am still blocked, how can I make a constructive, substantive contribution in this status? fstop22 (talk) 10:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You follow the procedure I laid out in your last unblock request. 331dot (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Tim Draper
Copied content from Tim Draper; see that article's history for attribution.

Theranos
Draper was one of the first investors in the blood testing start up Theranos, whose founder Elizabeth Holmes was later charged by the SEC with committing massive fraud.

Draper invested $500,000 in the seed stage round for Theranos.

After a Wall Street Journal investigation into Theranos, Draper accused WSJ reporter John Carreyrou of having a vendetta, and claimed that the investigation of Theranos was an elaborate conspiracy. In a 2016 interview with Rebecca Jarvis, Draper claimed that he saw "50 tests being run on 2 drops of blood" using Theranos technology and "it worked beautifully". In 2018, after the SEC had already charged Holmes with "elaborate, years-long fraud", Draper continued to defend her, calling her a "great icon" who had been "bullied into submission" despite having done a "great job".

Fstop22 (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC) fstop22

Samanage
Copied content from Samanage; see that article's history for attribution.

Samanage, an enterprise service-desk and IT asset-management provider, has its headquarters in Cary, North Carolina. The company's flagship product, Samanage, operates as a multi-tenant, Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) system for IT and enterprise service management. As of November 2018, Samanage had more than 1,800 customers in 50+ countries.

On April 11, 2019, Solarwinds announced its intent to acquire the company for $350 million.​

Fstop22 (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evolven


The article Evolven has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails the notability guideline for companies, heavy COI editing. Sources are trivial or non-independent."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)