User talk:Ftsw

--Ftsw (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I've tlp'd the unblock-auto template; you do not use that template for direct blocks. — MC10 ( T • C • GB •L)  16:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Your talk page
If you continue to edit disruptively here you will lose the ability to edit this page.  Tide  rolls  16:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I'm no chance given here for a actual review of the unblock request. Which means I'm not the one disrupting this page. --Ftsw (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * A user is not allowed to remove declined unblock requests during their block. To do so is disruptive.  Do not repeat this action.   Tide  rolls  17:02, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Unblock #2

 * Concentrate on getting your registered account unblocked. Then you can worry about the IP block.   Tide  rolls  17:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Both account and IP is blocked, I can only edit this user page and that I can project will be soon taken away from me too. --Ftsw (talk) 17:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * All irrelevant. The Autoblock unblock template does not apply here because you are blocked directly.   Tide  rolls  17:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I should know that better. --Ftsw (talk) 17:23, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Admin abuse/misuse
The decline comments shows clearly that the admin are trolling and not sincerely reviewing the unblock requests. --Ftsw (talk) 18:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Unblock #3
--Ftsw (talk) 18:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Final warning
If you repost an Autoblock unblock template or post another unblock template that does not address the issue(s) of your block, I will block your ability to edit this page.  Tide  rolls  18:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Instead of doing that review my unblock request sincerely and honest, that's all I' m asking for and then give me a chance. You all are denying me the opportunity to prove myself. --Ftsw (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * You are not being denied anything. Your unblock requests are being reviewed and declined.  You are presenting no new evidence.  My suggestion is that you leave messages here for the admins to read.  Do not apply an unblock template that ignores the issue(s) of your block or repeats unblock rationale that has been declined.  This is a misuse of the unblock template and wastes time.  This cannot continue.   Tide  rolls  18:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, wrong again because decline "reason" aren't such like : "If it looks like a duck..." and "socks are for Christmas presents not wikipedia" --Ftsw (talk) 19:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You were blocked for sockpuppetry, and your unblock requests were not convincing in the least bit.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

That's no excuse for such answers. --Ftsw (talk) 19:06, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I have attempted to explain the situation to you. If you are unwilling or unable to understand then I can be of no further assistance.  I can, however, assist those that wish to contribute constructively here by preventing them from having to waste their time with users that cannot edit within policy.  Decide which group you wish to join.  Regards   Tide  rolls  19:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

With such ignorant statement you have already decided which group I´m in. I therefore have no word over my own fate. --Ftsw (talk) 19:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC)