User talk:Fuelbottle/archive2

Visual System
I think you were the last person to edit and lock this template: Template:Visual system

It seems to me that in order to be accurate, and internally consistent, the optic tract needs to be added between the chiasm and LGN and the optic radiations between the LGN and visual cortex.

I created optic tract and optic radiations, and rendered LGN from a stub to a full article, in preparation for this.

Would you be willing to edit and re-lock this template? Thanks in advance. Jimhutchins 11:45, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Picasso's paintings
Hi. Did you find Picasso's paintings offered as public domain images somewhere online? Some Japanese Wikipedians are concerned about the copyright status of those images, and we would like to make sure that they are in public domain. There was a lawsuit in Japan involving some uses of images of Picasso's paintings, and some pointed out that Boston Museum of Fine Art has the exact copy of Image:Lola_Picasso_the_Artist%27s_Sister.jpg on its web site, and that is displayed as copyrighted.

Any info. is appreciated. Thanks! Tomos 12:58, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I think you are right in that we cannot easily assume public domain status under Japanese law, because Japan has been a signatory of Berne Convention since 1899. Tomos 05:48, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Image:Gestapo Rinnan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gestapo Rinnan.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much,   – Quadell (talk) (help)   05:26, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks. How about Image:5htsynt.jpg?   – Quadell (talk) (help)   21:00, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk) 19:14, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Image tag
Hello. I talked to you about Picasso's images before. I have just learned that there is a "PD-US" tag for works that is in the public domain but not necessarily in other jurisdictions. If you are not sure about copyright status in other jurisdictioons of some of the pre-1923 painings, I would like you to consider chaning their tags from PD to PD-US.

Or, if you don't mind, I would change them. Tomos 08:16, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Hi again. I just wanted to thank you for the swift action you took. I used category and lists of works to make sure nothing was left for me to do. Tomos 11:18, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

List of oncology-related terms
Hi Fuelbottle. What are your plans with the list of oncology-related terms? You seem to have created numerous stubs about experimental agents that are in Phase II trials. Furthermore, many terms on the list are not actually oncological (a lot are about HIV), and others do not deserve their own articles or even redirects (stage IV adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma would not be of anyone's benefit). Please discuss; I may be able to help as well. JFW | T@lk  08:48, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Birthe Neumann
Could you have a glance at the article Birthe Neumann; I did my best to translate and contextualize what someone pasted in in Danish, but it's not a language I know at all well. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:05, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

TNX
TNX. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:17, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)

Image:Alfred Meyer.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Alfred Meyer.jpg. Please leave a note on that page about the source of the image because of copyright law. Thank you. --Ellmist 06:30, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image:US-religion.jpg
Im a little confused as to what this pic is telling us, could you respond at its talk with this info or where you go it so i can look it up? thx Cavebear42 00:44, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Translation
Hello. Can you please translate some stuff from Norwegian? Just look at [] -- Darwinek 10:25, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Gerhard Klopfer.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Gerhard Klopfer.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you.

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. You seem to be not so active lately, but if you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 18:47, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

German images
You uploaded Image:GerhardFlesch.jpg under the tag PD-Germany. Unfortunately, the wording of this tag was inaccurate, and the image is not yet PD. However, it may still be usable under fair use. Could you consider changing the copyright tag to fairuse.

I also noticed that Image:Alfred Meyer.jpg is still untagged. The same arguments apply, i.e. the image is not PD, but may be fair use.

Thanks, and keep up the good work. Physchim62 13:17, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

EC numbers
Hey Fuelbottle! I have finally made a template that automates enzyme links to ExPasy. Using gets you ! I've done similar with Template:OMIM and it works very well. Who else should I tell? JFW | T@lk  28 June 2005 21:05 (UTC)


 * Great! I should link to PDB more often! JFW | T@lk  29 June 2005 12:49 (UTC)

Image:Couple espagnol devant une auberge.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Couple espagnol devant une auberge.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC) I listed this for deletion since no article use it. Thuresson 12:02, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Chemical drawings
Hi, I've listed a couple of your old images for deletion as there is now a better alternative available: I hope this is OK. –Mysid ( talk ) 13:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Image:Cholecalciferol.jpg, obsoleted by Image:Cholecalciferol.png
 * Image:Ergocalciferol.jpg, obsoleted by Image:Ergocalciferol.png

cell types
Thanks for getting things rolling on the cell type information box at the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject. I added some comments there. --JWSchmidt 12:31, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Rejuvenation rejig
Hi Fuelbottle, I see you moved text from Rejuvenation to Life extension and placed the Rejuvenation (river) article in its place. I can see why you did this, but I'm concerned you made this relatively major change without standard discussion, for instance merge tags, or simply mentioning it on relevant talk pages.

Personally I think that Rejuvenation as a process is distinct from the wider topic of life extension; such that it may need a separate article.

Perhaps a more neutral change would have placed a disambiguation page at Rejuvenation pointing to both Rejuvenation (River) and Rejuvenation (Life Extension).

Judicious use of Merge warning tags next time would be great. Ppe42 02:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I see your point. I think at least some of the text should stay in the life extension article though, especially since that article didn't really have any content of its own other than a messy list. If properly separated I guess it wouldn't hurt to place some of the rejuvenation section in its own article. Fuelbottle | Talk 02:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I've made a disambig page for rejuvenation and moved the stuff and added a cleanup tag to life extension. Fuelbottle | Talk 03:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Awesome! - I think thats a good solution overall. Ppe42 03:19, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Konstantin von Neurath.jpg
Hi, please add your source for this photo. Thuresson 14:39, 2 November 2005 (UTC)