User talk:Fugsawugsa

Please review WP guidelines on biographies at WP:BLP. Your edits at Armand Rousso may conflict with those guidelines. Thanks! Collect (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Armand Marc Rousso
If you find reliable sources with more info, use them, Deletion of sourced material without any real discussion on the Talk page does not work. Right now, hoever, your account looks like one of the most "single purpose accounts" on record, and further reverts of the Rousso article without discussion will likely not redound to your benefit. Thanks! Collect (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Continued deletions in the Armand Rousso article may lead to a formal complaint against your editing account. Thanks. Collect (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Your edits are being discussed at the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard
Hello Fugsawugsa. You are welcome to join the discussion at WP:COIN. A user has complained that your edits on this article are getting close to vandalism. EdJohnston (talk) 13:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Fugsawusa has done yet another revert to get rid of stuff he does not like. This is now a serious matter, and this is warning that I do intend viewing it as such.  Collect (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Block warning
Hello Fugsawugsa. You have ignored the WP:COI policies that were explained to you, and you have continued to delete well-sourced material from an article. If you revert again at Armand Rousso, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 01:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Per WP:COIN. Repeatedly removing material from an article against consensus. Editor will not engage in discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)