User talk:Fugu Alienking

August 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Carl Freer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Pichku (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Technically, it was not yet edit warring, and I had already stopped reverting and sought assistance. But nice to see that you got your last revert in before accusing me, I hope it made you feel good. —Fugu Alienking (contribs) 15:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Technicalities and WP:Wikilawyering is not allowed on wikipedia and I feel appalled at your way of putting this. Now you have reverted again partially. A revert means changing content of another user in whole or in part. I suggest you revert yourself to clear your self from this violation. --Pichku (talk) 10:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * By your definition, every edit on Wikipedia is a revert. I reiterate my previous suggestion for you to carefully study WP:OWN and consider your own actions toward the Carl Freer article. —Fugu Alienking (contribs) 12:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)