User talk:Fuhghettaboutit/subpage

Precoical young are typified by being born covered in down, having open eyes, and the ability to run around and feed themselves to some extent. The contrasting state are young, which are born more or less "helpless", being typically blind for some time after birth (on average until _____), have only a small covering of down if any, and whose movements are restricted to the nest alone. Although, the young of a few species fit each category precisely, the majority do not, resulting in the terms semi-precocial and semi-altricial, referring respectively to ...

https://books.google.com/books?id=riYBCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA34 https://books.google.com/books?id=OGyQDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA440 https://books.google.com/books?id=_9tczTapYXMC&pg=PA88 "altricial-precocial spectrum" https://books.google.com/books?id=j39rQ9yfwrwC&pg=PT192&

You could also click on the signature button that looks like this: located above the edit window which inserts the tildes for you. When you save, this will automatically format as a signature with your username displayed and the time you posted the comment.

Notability has a specific meaning here. It does not mean lacking in merit, that the subject is unimportant, or is not valuable. It means that in order to warrant encyclopedic entry, a topic (in this case you), has to have been the subject of substantive treatment in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. Please see Notability. The reason for this guideline is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a tertiary source, that properly only has articles on topics that have already been significantly published about—that the world has taken "note" of, and from which published material an article can be written with verifiable information. Thus, if a subject has not been sufficiently recognized by mainstream, reliable sources (books, magazines, etc.) by their publication of significant content about that subject, Wikipedia should not have an article about the subject. In any event, the article on you was deleted at a deletion discussion which can be viewed at Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers. If the necessary reliable sources to sustain an article exist, they weren't in the article when it was deleted and were not found by those who discussed the content. Note that this page is not for undeletion of articles that were deleted after discussion, but only for requested undeletion of articles deleted uncontroversially. If you can supply the reliable published sources that weren't in the article, that would be a start, and if you can't, well then you are like the vast majority of people: worthy, valuable, unique but not a proper topic for an encyclopedia article.



Misspelling/capitalization
Hi. I noticed your attempt to make an article for a misspelling of Kyouji Yamamoto. The mechanism we use for this is a redirect done by inserting the code  #REDIRECT correct name  into the created page for the misspelling. You can automatically produce this code by clicking the button above the edit field marked "#R". Hope this helps. Some useful links are set forth in the welcome template I am posting below.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I have deleted the above article under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Per your note that you want to work on it, I have placed the text in a subpage as suggested by WWGB. You may access it here: User:Yash2k4/Yash Agarwal. Frankly, this does not have the appearance of an article that will ever be able to meet our policy requirements but it's best that you know them so you are not surprised later if the article is deleted even after you have taken it to the next level.

subpage A7
First, for a subject to appear in this encyclopedia, the subject must be notable. We define that word for encyclopedia purposes as receiving significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject (we also have a subject specific notability guideline for people). Likewise, every fact in an article should be verified. In order to meet these requirements, the article should cite to reliable sources in its text.

We also strongly discourage people from writing about subjects they are close to such as themsleves, family memebers and friends as this presents a conflict of interest, and renders it well nigh impossible for the article to be written from a neutral point of view, which all articles must be. All this is to say that by all means, work on the article befoire going live again, but please understand that this is an encylcopedia, and not just a social site where you can post bios of family members. Best of luck to you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuhghettaboutit (talk • contribs) 11:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Alternate name
Hi. I noticed your attempt to make an article for an alternate name of Eliza Jakubek. The mechanism we use for this is a redirect, done by inserting the code  #REDIRECT name of main article  into the created page for the alternate name. You can automatically produce this code by clicking the button above the edit field marked "#R". Hope this helps. Some useful links are set forth in the welcome template I am posting below.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Guidance for disputing tagging

 * Hi ___. If you are going to argue the site is notable, please explore the relevant standard, WP:WEB. Most websites with 1,000 members have not been the subject "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself," or any meet any other criteria for inclusion. Remember that notability has nothing to do with a judgment call here of whether we "think" the subject is notable, but whether sources out in the world have implicitly deemed it so by writing about it, giving it an award, etc., as verified through reliable sources.--

Image instructions
Note that in order to do so, if the image is yours you must release it under a free license; if it is already released under a free license, you must state the license, and if it is copyrighted, in order for it to remain you must state the copyright license and your rationale for why it's use in the specific article it is to be used in constitutes fair use.

Prod
I came across a number of articles you took to afd for deletion while doing new pages patrol and I was wondering if you were familiar with the Proposed deletion process. Basically, you add reason for deletion to articles the deletion of which is not controversial, such as blatant advertizing, etc. Thereafter, if the prod template remains in the article for five days it is deleted without any debate. Anyone can remove the template for any reason. If that is done, you can take the article to the far more resource intensive afd process.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Userfy messages
Hi NAME. Welcome to Wikipedia! I have placed the text from your article, ARTICLE on your userpage, so you don't lose it, and have nominated that article for speedy deletion, as it appears to be about either you or a person you personally know, but not about a subject notable enough for inclusion in the article space of Wikipedia which is, after all, an encyclopedia. Please see WP:VAIN, WP:AUTO and notability for more on this topic.


 * Hi! I noticed your article, ????? and assume that is you. Every user is given a userpage where they are pretty much free to post content about themselves. I have placed the content of the article listed above on your userpage which you can access by clicking on "userpage" at the upper left of this screen, and nominated the article for Speedy Deletion. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia, and pages in the article space must be on subjects worthy of encyclopedic treatment which I don't think includes you or me.  For more on notability and articles about yourself, please see: WP:BIO, WP:AUTO and WP:VAIN.

Hi!. I noticed your article on ????? and assume that is you. However, pages about non-famous people are not normally notable enough to be the subject of articles on Wikipedia, as it is an encyclopedia, not a webhosting service or blog. However, every user can post pretty much anything they'd like to on their user page. Yours is accessible by clicking on "user page" above. You can post all the content from the article their. For more on notability and articles about yourself, please see: WP:BIO, WP:AUTO and WP:VAIN. Some useful links are set forth below.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

.

verror-specific + links
Please don't deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles as did to List of billionaires (2006). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Some useful links for using Wikipedia are set forth below:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

-- 

inuse-message

 * I placed a speedy delete tag on your ARTICLE article because when you posted it it had no content. You might, in the future, find this tag helpful,  . Just click on it to see what it would format to look like if you placed it in an almost empty article so that editors would see the article was actively being worked on.

DicDef - Constructive though not-notable
Note that your recent article on ARTICLE, though an obvious attempt at a constructive contribution to Wikipedia, likely does not meet our inclusion standards as it is a dictionary definition. It might be more appropriate on Wiktionary --~

integrated with
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test in List of billionaires (2006) worked, and thank you for removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start.

Note that you don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
 * The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
 * The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
 * The ability to start new pages.
 * The ability to rename pages.
 * The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
 * The ability to upload images.
 * The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
 * The eligibility to eventually become an administrator.
 * Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by  [ creating an account] . Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;, which will let others know who left it.

link formatting instructions

 * You probably know that you can link to other articles in this encylopedia by surrounding the name of an article with double brackets (article name) You can't link directly to most other wiki projects except with an external link. To make an external link just type the url like this: http://www.example.org. To make it appear just as a citation link, type the url in single brackets which will format like this:, and to make a piece of text link straight to the site and look like a normal wikilink, the same as the last but put a space after the url and type the text you want linked: linked text which would look like this: linked text. Clicking this link will take you to a tutorial on using wikipedia and how to use its markup. --Fuhghettaboutit 08:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

how to start an article
Hi NAME. Instructions on starting an article is explained on Starting a new page. You might also look at Your first article and How to write a great article.


 * Hmmm, now that the issue has been raised maybe we can come come up with a solution. How about placing just below each section header instructions with a link. For instance, for the law entry I was having trouble with: In order to edit the text below you must go to this section's associated subpages, accessible here....

Pages needing attention/Social Sciences and Philosophy

Reporting vandalism

 * You can report a vandal at Administrator intervention against vandalism. However, you should first warn the vandal with an appropriate series of warning messages. Some templates for this can be found at Template messages/User talk namespace. Before posting there, a final warning should have been given such as test3, test4 or blatantvandal) and the vandal must have vandalized within the last few hours, including after the final warning was given him or her.--

Reposting deleted content
Please stop reposting the article, NAME which was removed in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy, it is considered vandalism. If you continue to repost the article, as you have NUMBER times, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you--Fuhghettaboutit 23:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Relocating user to talk
Hi. Just to let you know I found a nothanks template on User:NAME's user page that you had placed and relocated it to his talk page (and substituted it) which I'm sure it what you intended (I do the same thing occasionally). Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit 21:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi NAME. I noticed the great work you are doing tagging new articles—not something newcomers do often. We need all the help we can get (our floodgates are leaking badly). So welcome and keep up the good work. By the way, it's a good practice to leave edit summaries. You can just copy and paste the tags you are using into the edit summary field.

Also note that it is often appropriate to leave a message on a creating user's talk page when tagging. For instance, for articles tagged as db-bio/db-band/db-group, nn-warn or vanity are useful (all of these templates, unlike the db deletion templates, should be substituted and have parameters for the name of the article being referred to in the warning, so you would format them like so: name of article--~ ). For clear nonsense, attacks, hoaxes, mild vandalism you can use test1article-n, (which succeeds to test2article-n and so on).

For articles that you have prodded (done by placing the prod, template like this your rationale for why the article should be deleted ; a very useful template for newpages patrol), you can add to the author's talk page prodwarning. You can explore various templates at Template messages. I hope this unsolicited advice is not unwelcome. If you have any questions about newpages patrol, or anything else, please do not hesitate to drop me a message.

Hi!
I noticed some tagging you were doing at new pages patrol. We need help so thanks! Just wanted to drop you a message about one issue. When you tag an article for speedy deletion, it really needs to fall into a specific speedy deletion criteria, which are listed at WP:CSD. There are a pretty short list of speedy deletion tags that are used often which tell you in their text the criteria they are used under (you can memorize them pretty quickly because their names tell you the criteria).

Here's a list of pretty much all of them: db-bio, db-group, db-web, db-nonsense, db-empty, db-nocontext, db-band, db-club, db-attack, db-repost, db-vandal, db-spam, , db-redirtypo, db-redirnone, db-blanked and db-talk. The article, F to C (or reverse) easy mental conversion may be a candidate for a nonsense tag or maybe a nocontext tag, but being trivial and not in need of an article, as you tagged it (which I agree with you about), aren't bases for speedy deletion. If nothing fits, the typical thing to do is to use a prod tag. If that is removed, or the deletion is controversial, the article can be listed at AFD. Cheers.

nothanks + notability =+ COI
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Central Laboratories article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also note that in order for a company to have an article, it must be notable; our specific criteria for corporations and companies is set forth at WP:CORP. Finally, we have a policy against article creation by self-interested parties. Please see WP:COI. Thanks and happy editing!

Hangon talk page reply
Hi ?????. Your good intentions are apparent. Let me tell you a bit about what is meant by "notable" as we use it for purposes of this encyclopedia. It does not refer to importance or fame or worth or whether we like the subject or not. It refers to whether the world at large has deemed a subject notable by making it the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself. For more on notability, see Notability. So my suggestion is that you attempt to find reliable sources which deal with this subject and cite them in the article. That is the best route to avoid deletion.

Company creation

 * It is probably not a good idea for you to write an entry for your company. We strongly discourage people from creating articles about subjects they are closely associated with as this presents a conflict of interest, which normally guarantees that the article will not meet our neutral point of view policy. You should also know that the subject of articles must be notable, and we define notability here as the topic being the subject of significant treatment in reliable, published, secondary sources that are independent of the topic. Please see generally, Notability and specifically, Notability (organizations and companies). Please also see the Business' FAQ. Information on the mechanics of creation is at Help:Starting a new page. You might also look at Your first article and How to write a great article.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Experiment
{{safesubst:Db-notice
 * namespace    =
 * target       = Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AN/PVS-21
 * nowelcome    = yes
 * header       =
 * header-text  = {{{header-text|Your draft article, [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AN/PVS-21}}
 * icon         = File:Information icon4.svg
 * wizard       = no
 * willprovide  = no
 * text         = Hello Fuhghettaboutit. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AN/PVS-21.
 * secondparagraph = The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{edit|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AN/PVS-21|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}} or {{tlc|db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.}} Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC) @Fuhghettaboutit: