User talk:Fulani215

Welcome!
Hi Fulani215! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Reading Beans Talk to the Beans 12:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Reading Beans. An edit that you recently made to Atiku Abubakar seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Reading Beans Talk to the Beans 12:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
I have reverted most of you edits because you have added references in a non-standard way, and it is unclear what content you intended the reference to support. References are normally added after the content they support, please to not add a reference at the very start of any article, or in a heading. See Citing sources and Help:Referencing for beginners. You have also removed several templates for no apparent reason. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I came here to say something similar. Thank you for your good-faith edits.  Citations are valuable and I hope you'll continue to add them, but the links above explain exactly where they will do the most good.  Certes (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have continued to add references in a non-standard way, in spite of my asking you not to. Your edits have been reverted by multiple editors. Most or all of the citations you have added are to the search page of a newspaper, which is of no use as a source. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Can something be done about these users? This users and the others like them have added hundreds of nonsense links to hundreds of pages. Continuing the process of individual users having to revert them will take forever. They are completely unresponsive on their talk pages too. Watercheetah99 (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The edit summaries refer to 1Lib1Ref organised by WP:GLAM. Hashtag campaigns do motivate well-meaning people to start editing but may not always give them sufficient guidance to make the contributions a net positive. Certes (talk) 00:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, someone should contact the organizer of this project because these users are adding nonsense to dozens of pages a day. Watercheetah99 (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)