User talk:Fulginic

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Paymenex


A tag has been placed on Paymenex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MrOllie (talk) 23:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 00:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Act of newbie
Sorry it act of newbie, thanks for that comment, I think the page is ok to stay as it is an academic research project that will be useful to new students in that field Fulginic (talk) 00:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:XWallet Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:XWallet Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:3W Sentry Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:3W Sentry Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Paymenex logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Paymenex logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Paymenex Deletion
This the first article I am posting on Wiki, want to learn more about it, I found that Paymenex is an academic research at two Universities here in UK and developed as a solution for fraud in card not present transaction, can I have guideline to correct the advert looking part of the article? Fulginic (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I have just had a look at the deleted article. Unlike some articles that get speedily deleted, it is not out and out spam, and it is difficult to pick out particular details that make it promotional. However, the whole tone and character of the article is promotional, and the overall impression on reading it is that the article is trying to tell me about the virtues and strengths of Paymenex, rather than to give a neutral account. In fact, it reads rather like a PR piece. It should be impossible to tell from reading an article whether its author thinks its subject is good, bad, or indifferent, or indeed even whether its author has any opinion about it at all. When an article is really spam, it is normally very easy to pick out particular bits of phrasing that look like promotion, but in a case like this, where it's the overall tone and feel that is problematic, it's much more difficult to say exactly what can be improved about it. I also don't regard myself as very good at advising in cases like this, unfortunately. I have looked around at various Wikipedia guidelines, but I can't find any that really seems to give the sort of advice that you need. Neutral point of view, PROMOTION and Spam are all relevant to the general issue of not writing in a promotional way, but none of them seems to me to be really what you want. However, I have "userfied" the article, which means I have restored it and moved it to User:Fulginic/Paymenex, to give you a chance to work on it. It is important to realise that this is a temporary step, to give you time to improve the page before returning it to Paymenex, not a long-term way of keeping content that would not be acceptable as an article, and any page which seems to be purely promotional is liable to deletion if it stays around too long. However, I can't see any problem with your taking a few weeks to get it worked on. I may be able to find another editor who may be better able to help you than I feel I am, or you may be able to get help by asking at Help desk. (Sometimes the help desk is really useful, sometimes it isn't, but it may be worth a try.) Finally, I am posting (below) a "Welcome" message, which is rather more detailed than the one that Mishae put at the top of this page. You may perhaps find some of the links in it useful. Your first article and Writing better articles, for example, may be worth a look. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * }

Paymenex restoration
Hey, I've just had a look at the page again, and you have done a very good job of removing the promotional feel from it. Very often, a new editor who writes an article that looks promotional takes a very long time to learn how to do better, and sometimes they never manage to make it better at all, and just seem to be totally incapable of seeing what looks promotional about it, but you have done a good job right away. There are several reasons for userfying an article in a situation like this, rather than just undeleting it and leaving it where it is. One of the most important reasons is that, if I had just restored it as an article, there would have been nothing to stop someone else seeing it and tagging it for speedy deletion again, so that it could be gone again before you even had time to look at it. However, I don't think that there is any serious danger of that now, so I will move it back to where it came from. Of course, that doesn't have to be the end of it, and you may like to add more content to it: that's obviously up to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paymenex


The article Paymenex has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

The article you deleted has been peer reviewed by other Administrators like you over the years and approved as having met the standard, if you go through the history you will see that idea, aim to improve article son Wikipedia, The project is a graduate research project that has been academically reviewed and passed, I think is meets all criteria to be on Wikipedia. Fulginic (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Nothing in your argument addresses the concerns listed above; however you are welcome to request undeletion at WP:REFUND. But you'll need to present better arguments than what you posted above. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Paymenex logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Paymenex logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)