User talk:Fullerm8/sandbox

Peer Review
The references you chose seem to be accurately represented in the sentences that you chose to add. Is this article strictly about human lactational amenorrhea? There were a limited amount of references in the wiki article, so I was wondering if there were any studies that saw this phenomenon in other mammalian species. Might be something interesting to add to the article.

If you use this sentence: “The same increase in length was found in multiparous women as opposed to primiparous”, it may be helpful to link the words “multiparous” and “primiparous” to another wiki page that explains those words or expand on the sentence to explain what they mean. I think it best to elaborate on certain terms since those who go to wikipedia most likely don’t have background knowledge in the subject area. Same with “parturition” and “fecundity” in the second paragraph.

Instead of the word “additionally” in your first sentence, maybe use “however” or just start without a transition word since it is only the second sentence. I think this is a good introduction, and a good piece of information because it is something that is often missed with this topic.

I’m not sure if your other group members were going to hit any topics listed in your ideas section, but it would be really interesting to see what is to be said about sex-bias as related to the effort given to the different sexed babies. That is something that is most likely influenced by culture.

All in all, I think that what you contributed to the article helps to explain some lesser known details on the subject, and would be really beneficial for those who want to know what “lactational amenorrhea” is.

Reply to peer review: Thank you for your comments. I will talk to my group about maybe adding in information about other mammals. Right now the article is solely focused on human lactational amenorrhea because it is from a perspective focusing on birth control methods. --Fullerm8 (talk) 19:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)