User talk:Fullkomnun

Recent edit to Medina (singer)
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Medina (singer)), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Tove Lo discography
Please don't use "Fall" as a date per WP:SEASON. Also, you will need to include the reference on the page, as http://www.breatheheavy.com/tove-los-perky-new-tune-disco-tits-made-a-brief-appearance-on-spotify/ is invisible to readers simply browsing the article. That article also does not say Lady Wood (Phase 2), it simply says "Chapter two of Lady Wood", so that title is unsourced.  Ss 112  22:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tove Lo discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Ss 112  22:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

January 2019
Your recent editing history at Greyson Chance shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please stop adding unsourced information to the article—information in Wikipedia must be verifiable and cited. If you are adding material, you must indicate it was obtained from a reliable source. —Joeyconnick (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)