User talk:Fulltimegroove

Groove Phi Groove
Please do not remove referenced information. The article information is reference to an issue of the Howard University Newspaper, the Hilltop.Naraht (talk) 02:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

It’s incorrect. Why would i allow misinformation about my organization to stand? Fulltimegroove (talk) 04:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia
Wikipedia isn't governed by the laws of Groove Phi Groove and Wikipedia is not censored.Naraht (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Groove Phi Groove, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Naraht (talk) 03:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Knowledge
It is entirely possible you are better informed about Groove Phi Groove than I am. However, Wikipedia works off of Verifiability. And members of an organization do *not* own the Wikipedia article about them. See WP:OWN. In fact, you have a definitely Conflict of Interest on the Article and should not edit it at all.Naraht (talk) 03:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Groove Phi Groove) for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Primefac (talk) 06:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * For the record, if you can show that you can edit productively and discuss conflicts with others on the talk page, I am happy to remove this restriction and allow you to edit the page directly. Primefac (talk) 07:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

I explained that the things on the page is factually incorrect but the user you are speaking about keeps adding the incorrect info back citing some random article from a university while ignoring the fact that I am an international officer in Groove and know what’s accurate and what is not. Fulltimegroove (talk) 11:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * We have a source that provides verification for the information in question. You say it is incorrect but give no counter-factual argument, choosing instead to just claim it loudly and continue to revert contrary to policy. That being said, a discussion (on the talk page) could very well determine that this information is trivial and is therefore not necessary to include, even if it is true, but until that discussion is started then the sourced content will stay in the article. Primefac (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Groove Phi Groove does not believe that we should have to negotiate with any non member as to what is an appropriate representation of our organization and what constitutes a misrepresentation of us. If that’s your position on the matter. I want to formally notify you that Groove Phi Groove is a trademark and is protected property of Groove Phi Groove Social Fellowship, Inc. as an international officer, i am requesting that you remove all referenced material because I’ve informed you that that information is a misrepresentation of our organization. As of last night I have spoken to our international president Ahmad Mcdougal, and he has informed me that you don’t have any written authority to use our trademarks (our shield) or our copyrights (our name). As such we are formally requesting that you remove all references to our organization. If you have any questions or need further clarification, feel free to contact me directly at Nar.exec.board@gphig.org or our president at president@gphig.org

Please document this conversation as a formal notification of a potential violation to our trademarks and copyrights. Thank you Fulltimegroove (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Firstly, you should be aware that trademarks and service marks protect brands and brand names from being used to advertise or market similar services. A trademark holder does not have the right to prevent all use or mention of the trademarked work or phrase. See Trademark
 * The Wikimedia Foundation does not claim copyrights or any other intellectual-property ownership interest in any article on Wikipedia (the copyrights are held by the authors themselves), and, furthermore, any reproduction of your trademark in the course of an article may be an instance of "trademark fair use" or of "nominative" use of the trademark (see Fair use (U.S. trademark law) for a discussion of these defenses).
 * As a result, we are not in a position to fulfill your request that the trademark be removed from any Wikipedia articles.
 * Regarding the use of the shield, please see Non-free content for why we are able to use a small representation of this image for illustrative purposes.
 * You are welcome to contact our Legal department on, but further "formal requests" in the vein of pseudo-legal action will likely not be entertained since at current none of our policies are being violated. As I mentioned before, if you want any content removed from the article, you should start a discussion at Talk:Groove Phi Groove. Primefac (talk) 15:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia proclaims itself to be a medium that perpetuates verified information and well as it asks for donations. I don’t know about you but i know i am no lawyer so i won’t proclaim who has standing and who does not. Fulltimegroove (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)